The issue is that republicans are removing voters who are alive and well.
I didn't know about that issue until now. How are they removing them?
Republicans are to busy making it harder to vote and easier to cheat on elections to care in any way about the American people.
You are mixed up... Republicans are making it harder to cheat and easier to vote.
Republicans simply say... Don't mail out ballots that are not requested.
That is the way mail in voting works here.
If Trump gets in and he starts his mass deportation program... He should focus on the bad people... Rapist and murderers...
I'm not sure there will be a mass deportation program unless project 2025 proves to be real and is actioned upon.
and the people who illegally vote during Federal elections.
That doesn't happen, and if it do you could arrest/deport those people now.
That depends on which Republicans we are talking about. My state SOS is doing just that. Others are indeed trying to make it more difficult
by claiming that restriting voting to one day is somehow safer, and are trying to make it easier to cheat by claiming that hand-counted paper ballots are the only safe way to go.
I didn't know about that issue until now. How are they removing them?
In most cases they are not. Here, they sent out letters informing people who'd not voted in a long time that they needed to update their address information with voter registration or they'd be removed. If they responded that they were still in the state, they were not removed.
Yes, that was a Republican governor's administration.
Now, here is how the DEMOCRATS used to do it here.
If you did not vote for 4 consecutive years, they would send you a letter telling you that you *have been removed* -- note that is NOT will be removed, but have already been. They would also inform you that, in
order to re-register, you would have to pay a fine.
So any idea that *only* Republicans do such things is typical British Columbian Bologna.
Only sending them to people who request them is somehow a Republican conspiracy to prevent people from voting.
Trump has indicated there will be deportations, independently of, and before the Project 2025 hogwash came to light.
That doesn't happen, and if it do you could arrest/deport those people now.
That does happen, and people do get prosecuted for it (if they get caught).
They are not always Democrats,
either, and they are often citizens (which means you cannot deport them).
* SLMR 2.1a * This message brought to you by JAMMITIN (tm)!!
Dead people don't vote for reasons that are mostly obvious.
There have been cases over the years where votes were cast on behalf of
dead people who were still on the register.
Project 2025 is hardly hogwash.
Next time you come to the states, tell people that you're scared to
death of Project 2025. They will help keep you safe from it.
Only sending them to people who request them is somehow a Republican conspiracy to prevent people from voting.
I don't see any conspiracy here.
Trump has indicated there will be deportations, independently of, and before
the Project 2025 hogwash came to light.
There are deportations already. I read that the Biden admin has deported more people at the border than the Trump admin did.
I don't watch the border. I'm not sure how true hat is.
Project 2025 is hardly hogwash.
Dead people don't vote for reasons that are mostly obvious.
There have been cases over the years where votes were cast on behalf of dead people who were still on the register.
Yes, I have seen these stories.
That's why it is important the people who have passed are removed from the voter rolls as IB Joe was saying is happening or has happened in texas.
It is just as important that the living are not removed as long as they are legitimate voters.
Project 2025 is hardly hogwash.
Next time you come to the states, tell people that you're scared to death of Project 2025. They will help keep you safe from it.
Project 2025 is hardly hogwash.
Believing that if Trump deports people, then he is following Project 2025
and not his own promises *is* hogwash,
especially if you also admit to knowing that Biden has also been deporting people. Does that mean Biden is following Project 2025 now, too?
Projects to remove deceased (and moved away) voters are often blocked by Democrats.
Sometime during 2016-19, our current governor was the state AG
and he did just that when he sucessfully blocked a project to remove the deceased and moved-away. As a result, deceased voters got added back to
the rolls.
It is just as important that the living are not removed as long as they are >> legitimate voters.
In the example above, the project AG Bashear blocked was attempting to
notify voters, before removing them, that they needed to update their information. He blocked it anyway even though, in past, the state (under Democrat control) had removed people *before* notifying them.
The republican party has a long record of removing the living from the voter rolls. They don't seem to want (some) people voting.
The republican party has a long record of removing the living from the
voter rolls. They don't seem to want (some) people voting.
How long is "long?" When and where did this happen? And which Republican(s) were involved?
Or did the reporter you're parroting forget to give you those details?
I understand the AG (I think you know him) in Texas has been raiding Latino civil rights organizations. It's beeing called voter intimidation.
I understand the AG (I think you know him) in Texas has been raiding
Latino civil rights organizations. It's beeing called voter intimidation.
No.
I could squawk all day about California, but nah, it's somebody else's problem.
I could squawk all day about California, but nah, it's somebody else's problem.
California has it's problems as every state does to one degree or
another but it is also highly successful.
California has it's problems as every state does to one degree or
another but it is also highly successful.
What do you mean by successful? The media has been reporting a lot of businesses leaving California.
But of course that might be just a bunch of lies, and maybe businesses are not leaving California. It's hard to know for sure what's happening in a state without living in it, very, very hard to know.
But not everyone has the same definition of every word. Would "successful" describe a state losing it's businesses to other states? Someone wishing for socialism or for the bringing down of a country might call that "success."
California has it's problems as every state does to one degree or
another but it is also highly successful.
Some businesses are leaving California for tax and regulation reasons.
I understand that "Socialist" is Donald Trumps favorite word but California is not a socialist state and nor has California done anything like "bringing down a country".
Project 2025 is hardly hogwash.
Believing that if Trump deports people, then he is following Project 2025 and not his own promises *is* hogwash,
Oh, I believe Trump when he says he is going to do a mass deportation.
Trump would/will do that regardless of project 2025.
Projects to remove deceased (and moved away) voters are often blocked by Democrats.
That is regular maintenance, or at least it should be.
In the example above, the project AG Bashear blocked was attempting to notify voters, before removing them, that they needed to update their information. He blocked it anyway even though, in past, the state (under Democrat control) had removed people *before* notifying them.
There is no need to notify dead people, go ahead and remove them.
It is OK to keep addresses and what not current, but living voters should not be removed.
Some businesses are leaving California for tax and regulation reasons.
I get it. California used to have a successful economy.
Trump would/will do that regardless of project 2025.
That was my logic. Yours was "if Trump does a mass deporation, it is a
sign he is following Project 2025."
There is no need to notify dead people, go ahead and remove them.
It is OK to keep addresses and what not current, but living voters should not >> be removed.
In the USA, if a voter MOVES they are REQUIRED to re-register because they are likely no longer in the same district, and especially if they move out-of-state. If they do not re-register, it is not the government's fault but their own fault for not following directions.
Some businesses are leaving California for tax and regulation reasons.
I get it. California used to have a successful economy.
That is a lie. California and New York both have successful econimies.
I think it's safe to stop there.
In the USA, if a voter MOVES they are REQUIRED to re-register because th are likely no longer in the same district, and especially if they move out-of-state. If they do not re-register, it is not the government's fa but their own fault for not following directions.
That is all well and good.
However what is happening is folks who have not moved or changed much of anything being removed.
I don't know. Is this enough to appease the leftist gods? They might want you to take these false claims to the next level.
However what is happening is folks who have not moved or changed much of
anything being removed.
Tell us their names.
However what is happening is folks who have not moved or changed much o >> anything being removed.
Tell us their names.
You want me to tell you their names!?
I'll tell you one. Daniel Moss. His place on the voter roll was
challenged as ineligible by a group called free the vote.
His name and thousands of others.
Do a little reaserch, would ya?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKFALtjiS_8&t=27s
There's a good reason why you can only tell me 1 name,
and that's because this ridiculous CNN "report" only tells 1 name. You're falling for BS. BS is slippery when it's fresh, but by the end of the day it dries up and no longer poses a slip hazard.
There are times when videos show evidence of things, but this video shows no evidence of anything. If you were a court judge, there would be major protests outside your courtroom on a daily basis. They'd call you "Judge BS."
Trump would/will do that regardless of project 2025.
That was my logic. Yours was "if Trump does a mass deporation, it is a sign he is following Project 2025."
Trump would/will implement much of project 2025 as well.
That is a lie. California and New York both have successful econimies.
I think it's safe to stop there.
I think it's safe to stop there.
That is a lie. California and New York both have successful econimies.
I think it's safe to stop there.
No they don.... Both are failing... Both have people moving out of the state..
Recently Elon moved all his California holding out of California to Texas...
Chevron Oil is also moving from California. All complaining about regulations and high taxes...
and poop on the street.... Ohhhh and Silvester Stallone... among many others are moving out as well.
There are more people leaving California and moving in... The wealth is leaving.
The same is happening in New York. Major financial firms are bugging out and moving to Texas, as did Elon, where there is no state income tax.
I think it's safe to stop there.
Don't tell me what to do...
Recently Elon moved all his California holding out of California to
Texas...
That is likely for "regulation reasons". Regulations are a good thing
when they are about best practices. If companies would keep up best practises without regulations than regulations would not be needed.
Regulations are neseccary. In most cases they spell out best practises.
Regulations cost nothing and cause no delays.
Following regulations may add costs and/or delays but they are there for
a reason.
What regulation requires DEI?
Trump has succeeded in making some Americans hate again.
Regulations are neseccary. In most cases they spell out best practises.
Over regulation is bad and stifles growth.
Regulations cost nothing and cause no delays.
Regulations cost tones... Large corporations love them because smaller companies can't afford them...
Latest was DEI... how F#$king stupid is that...
U have to hire a 1 legged black hermaphrodite with pronouns to make sure you're represented.
Following regulations may add costs and/or delays but they are there for
a reason.
Regulations are the main reason... it takes 15 to 20 years to build a road sometime because they are worried about a frog or a snail.
I have a buddy who builds homes and he says that about 1/3 of the price of building a new home is based on regulations....
Do you have a clue what you're talking about??
What regulation requires DEI?
For Democrats its having to hire weird people, a lot of the times unfit or unqualified for the job... Trump redefined it to Deport Every Illegal...
Trump has succeeded in making some Americans hate again.
Nope... It's the left that hates... Go to a Trump rally... they dance and sing patriotic songs.
It's better than Hawaii's debt to GDP ratio by comparison, but how much better would it be if Democrats didn't push all the major brands out of state?
I don't think democrats are pushing people out. Some may choose to go elsewhere. That's fine.
Since Kathy Hochul's rogue regime took over, now businesses are being su for hundreds of millions of dollars just for breaking bank policies.
I couldn't find any info about this.
Since Kathy Hochul's rogue regime took over, now businesses are being su >> > for hundreds of millions of dollars just for breaking bank policies.
I couldn't find any info about this.
I'm referring to Trump's "civil fraud trial."
I'm aware of Trumps civil fraud trial and conviction. He'll be sentenced in a few weeks.
It wasn't about bank policy, Trump's actions were against state law.
What has that got to do with Kathy Hochul?
The regulations don't cost anything. Doing things right might add costs. Doing things wrong will also add costs.
I have never seen any road take that long.
For Democrats its having to hire weird people, a lot of the times unfit unqualified for the job... Trump redefined it to Deport Every Illegal...
That is not DEI.
Sysop: | deepend |
---|---|
Location: | Calgary, Alberta |
Users: | 269 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 70:05:14 |
Calls: | 2,173 |
Files: | 4,592 |
D/L today: |
10 files (10,000K bytes) |
Messages: | 418,160 |