I have seen in the past few months that Marjorie had voted not with the party and a few other things got me thinking something was up with her.
She was an attention-seeker from the start. Remember her campaign video with her shooting at targets with leftist concepts on them? It was cute, but ridiculous and too one-sided.
She's probably been friends with the left for a long time already. Now
she can be a tool for anti-MAGA propaganda.
She's probably been friends with the left for a long time already. No she can be a tool for anti-MAGA propaganda.
This maybe the case but personally I think it was a miss calculation on her point.
She and Tom Massie teamed up together... To my understanding Tom said
that Trump will be gone in a few years... But our vote will live on forever.
BTW, He last day is January 5th... She is eligible for a lifetime
pension on January 3rd.
IB Joe wrote to Aaron Thomas <=-
MTG was not into wars. Just an observation... When Trump blew-up
Iran's Nuclear stuff I saw a change in her.
Daddy Trump... In Iran for ~10 minutes. Eliminates the issue. Back out
in no time flat. MAYBE someone died and if they did they weren't
American and at best it was just a handful of people.
On top of this... Trump is blowing up boats full of narcotic... It
pisses of the Narcoterrorist but not as much as MTG.
BTW, He last day is January 5th... She is eligible for a lifetime
pension on January 3rd.
The was a reason she waited.
Going on The View wasn't a miscalculation. She was there making friends with them.
Kentucky is a RINO state. Mitch Mcconnel, Rand Paul, Tom Massie, Mike Powell, all they do is make good chicken.
I knew Marjorie was fake when he announced that she was "filing articles of impeachment against Biden for failing to secure Afghanistan after the withdrawl." I knew that was going nowhere, and I recognized it as virtue signaling. She does it every time she talks.
RINOs always do what's in their best interest.
Do I like this? No. But there's no other way to handle them. That's reality.
BTW, He last day is January 5th... She is eligible for a lifetime pension on January 3rd.
The was a reason she waited.
I can't blame her for that, though. If I was in the same position, I'd have done the same thing.
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
The first president EVER to confront these assh@les... Trump should
blow every boat heading our way thats full of drugs.
BTW, I have hear that Madura is looking for an exit plan... I have
heard this recently and I'm waiting to hear more on the topic.
He's looking to exit and not be arrested.
@RonL... She's a Whore
@RonL... She's a Whore
More like a "soccer mom". Completely unsuited for the hard decisions
that need to be made as a politician.
When she started 5 or 6 years ago her net worth came in at ~$700K... 5
or 6 years later she's worth $25,000,000.00... What the F@ck is that...
And she thinks Trump is on the take. Trump is the only politician in my lifetime who's Net Worth declined after running for office.
I've come to the conclusion that MTG is a whore and will do anything to advance her career... She was part of MAGA on her way in because she saw an opportunity.
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
Nope... Lets compromise... She's a Soccer-Mom-Whore that made 25
million in stock trades in less than a few years.
I'd like to see the receipts for all that money.
He generously invited millions of people to rallies in huge venues like the Mohegan Sun Arena, free of charge. There's no way his donors paid
for all that.
Now, **that** needs to be investigated. Maybe we can lump her in when they investigate Pelosi.
IB Joe wrote to Aaron Thomas <=-
Almost anyone would. She went from just a few hundred K to 25 million. Her public records shows that she made over 10 million in stock trades
in 2025 alone.
No formal training... Just woke up one day and thought she'd give stock trading a try.
Of course, she could have just followed what Crazy Nancy was doing in
the stock market.
I hear there are more than a few people (outside the gov't) who have
done that and made good money.
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
And Nancy kicks their asses ... and she was drunk at the time as well.
I think MTG steps down because the questions will start soon.
I think you're right on that.
But it does make me think that there is a corrupting influence in Washington - outside the gov't - that makes good people to bad things
and then uses that to make them vote in certain ways.
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
How is it that congress polices itself. The other day they held a vote against a house member ... Whatever her name was... Back room deals.
There should be a mechanism that monitors congress... or something...
to stop the back room deals
I know this is why we have elections... But Nancy made 100s of
millions off her job... Apparently MTG made millions.
They'll keep doing it until??
Aaron Thomas wrote to All <=-
I haven't been paying very close attention but I just read that
Marjorie Taylor Greene is resigning from congress early, with a year
left of her term, leaving her seat and the whole country vulnerable to
the Socialist Party.
That's pretty slimy of her to trash Trump, announce resignation a year early, and then to go on The View.
Marjorie Taylor Greene is resigning from congress early, with a year left of her term, leaving her seat and the whole country vulnerable t the Socialist Party.
But that still begs the questions:
What turned someone who was seemingly pro-America into anti-America?
Where we misled from the start and MTG was really anti-America in the first place?
We've seem this with several people recently. Ex: Tucker Carlson,
Candice Owen.
Can TDS impact good people?
Theory: Back to the idea of the Elitists and their need to be "on top". It seems to me that Elitists are more likely to suffer from TDS. Could these "good" people really just closet Elitists, get TDS and basically
go insane?
I haven't been paying very close attention but I just read that Marjorie Taylor Greene is resigning from congress early, with a year left of her term, leaving her seat and the whole country vulnerable to the Socialist Party.
That's pretty slimy of her to trash Trump, announce resignation a year early, and then to go on The View. That's 3 fists up our butts all at
the same time, and I'm not into that fisting stuff.
Fun Fact... Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib and AOC get $7000 contributions
from sources Arabic names. The origins of the names, not so important
to my point.
Thom Massie, John Thune and several other RINOs... and I learned today that Marjorie Traitor was in that list... Receiving money from the same people who are funding Ilhan Oman et al..
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
I saw the fakeness in her right from the start. My suspicion began with her ridiculous TV commercials,
and her articles of impeachment against
Joe Biden was another clue (because it went nowhere.)
Like Dan Bongino
always says "There are fake Republicans, but there are no fake
Democrats."
I used to like Tucker, but I've seen the fakeness in him too, and
Candice Owen. They both used to make good points about the left, but
they sold out and they both turned their backs against us.
No! They were never good to begin with, they were just trying to
impress us so they could plant seeds.
jealous of Trump I think. Candace Owens for example; she pal'd around
with Trump during his 1st year as president, but then said "I'm gonna
run against him in the primary because I want to be president," and
then she never even ran for anything (think of her as the right's DEI hire.)
Aaron Thomas wrote to IB Joe <=-
I knew that Massie was a RINO but John Thune? I thought Thune was our
bud?
I used to listen to her for a while, but she was focusing on fluff stuff and most of her "news" was old, so it wasn't worth listening to her.
She was supposed to have done an expose on how BLM spent their money,
but I never really saw that come to life.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
Regarding Candace Owens, the same goes for her wanting to run for president. She didn't run, and I doubt she even tried to collect signatures or to raise money for a campaign.
She wants attention, just like Marjorie. I'm not sure which one is more desperate for it.
She wants attention, just like Marjorie. I'm not sure which one is mo desperate for it.
Attention or just influence (i.e. power). That would make sense to me. If their desire was influence, they failed - and not just before they
went off the deep end.
I knew that Massie was a RINO but John Thune? I thought Thune was our
bud?
That's a good observation that you made though, them all getting money from the same sources. Maybe Thune is some kind of a stealth-RINO who
only does special subtle things for the Democrats.
Thune is not my buddy. He's drabbing his feet on returning the
filibuster back the speaking filibuster and hence stopping the Save America Act.
If I have a Buddy its Trump and maybe Anna Paulina Luna... That's it.
There are other RINOs in the senate who will vote against saving America. Something needs to be done about that before he calls a vote on it. Shouldn't he postpone it until next year? It has a 0% chance of passing right now.
Trump is 100% reliable but nobody else is.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
Attention or just influence (i.e. power). That would make sense to me.
If their desire was influence, they failed - and not just before they
went off the deep end.
That's how I see it too. I'd rather watch The View than listen to
Candace Owens. At least those old hags have jobs.
IB Joe wrote to Aaron Thomas <=-
Thune is not my buddy. He's drabbing his feet on returning the
filibuster back the speaking filibuster and hence stopping the Save America Act.
If I have a Buddy its Trump and maybe Anna Paulina Luna... That's it.
That's how I see it too. I'd rather watch The View than listen to
Candace Owens. At least those old hags have jobs.
There are other RINOs in the senate who will vote against saving Amer Something needs to be done about that before he calls a vote on it. Shouldn't he postpone it until next year? It has a 0% chance of passi right now.
It does. If they go with the speaking filibuster they need 50, and we have that, and JD will break the tie or Fetterman can.
Candace Owens entertains the idea that the earth might be flat. So
much so, that she sent a producer with an expedition to Antarctica a little over a year ago to see if the sun was up for 24 hours there (it was)
Aaron Thomas wrote to IB Joe <=-
Thune says "we don't have the votes." Isn't it possible that he's
telling the truth about that? Murkowski and Collins aren't the only
RINOs in the senate; there are more. Some of them ass-out unexpectedly
at the last minute. We actually need backroom deals on the table in
order for this to happen the way we want it do. If the RINOs f this up then we have to deal with congress all over again.
IHMO: Force the vote and force the RINOs to make a choice:
1. Betray their constituents and vote against SAFE - and lose the next election, or get recalled.
2. Vote for it - and piss off the ones bribing/blackmailing/etc. them.
By Thune blocking a vote, he's protecting them. Which means that he's being bribed/blackmailed/etc.
Thune is a traitor and needs to be replaced.
The level of corruption in todays politics is unbelievable.Of course, when the criminal is in power, this is exactly what happens.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
It looks that way, but it also makes sense to postpone the vote until
we get closer to election day.
People forget stuff that happened a day
ago. They'll forget that Murkowski and the other beaches voted against saving America, they'll never ask for a primary, and then they'll do a straight-ticket ballot.
I think Thune should wait until November 3rd.
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
The level of corruption in todays politics is unbelievable. DO NOT say its always been corrupt... Say it started after Barry was elected.
We have people on the take. Insider trading... They get elected and ignore the people who voted them in. Both sides need to just vote the Save America Act in because almost everyone wants it. Everyone but the Democrat party.
It looks that way, but it also makes sense to postpone the vote until we get closer to election day.
IHMO: Bad idea.
First, because there has to be a delay in implementation. You just
can't drop new rules and expect them to be implemented overnight.
Then because you know that there will be TONS or court cases from the
Left to delay the implementation.
We need time for the Supremes to say "Yes, you will implement them for
the midterms".
IB Joe wrote to Ron L. <=-
The level of corruption in todays politics is unbelievable. DO NOT say its always been corrupt... Say it started after Barry was elected.
We have people on the take. Insider trading... They get elected and ignore the people who voted them in. Both sides need to just vote the Save America Act in because almost everyone wants it. Everyone but the Democrat party.
Thune says "we don't have the votes." Isn't it possible that he's
telling the truth about that? Murkowski and Collins aren't the only
RINOs in the senate; there are more. Some of them ass-out unexpectedly
at the last minute. We actually need backroom deals on the table in
order for this to happen the way we want it do. If the RINOs f this up then we have to deal with congress all over again.
By Thune blocking a vote, he's protecting them. Which means that he's being bribed/blackmailed/etc.
Of course, when the criminal is in power, this is exactly what happens. You voted for this idiot, - don't fucking complain now.
It looks that way, but it also makes sense to postpone the vote until we get closer to election day.
IHMO: Bad idea.
I can't. It's been corrupt for a long time. But in the past, it was a personal corruption and the people involved knew that they had a limit because too much would hurt everyone - including themselves.
In more recent history, the corruption seems to almost be at a self-destructive level. And Osama wasn't the start. He was just the
most visible in recent history.
And you see that's the difference.
Long ago, things like insider trading enriched the particular senator,
but did little to harm the country as a whole. And if the senator kept things quiet, he could retire wealthy, and have a nice country to live
in.
In more recent history, it seems like they not only want to enrich themselves, but wreck the country too. So they retire wealthy, but live in a s#!t hole. That makes no sense for greedy people.
The graft isn't limited to one party.
How does requiring proof of citizenship on election day prevent
corruption by both parties once elected? The issue of campaign finance
reform and term limits are more prescient - once elected, you can trade
influence for kickbacks and campaign donations, increasing your chance
of re-election and continuing the cycle of graft.
The Speaking Filibuster is simple majority after the Dem speak as to why they don't support common sense things like proving that you are a
citizen and showing ID on the way in to vote.
Thune can change this tomorrow, but he may be on someone's payroll.
If we have a senate leader who works as hard as Trump we'd be good to go...
BTW, let me ask you... Do you think Chuck or Nancy would have been asked to do whatever they can to put through whatever legislation they can...
NO... They'd do anything ANYTHING at all to push their agenda. If they win the House in November there will be impeachments everyday until the 2028 election.
and Trump is not a criminal, his bogus charges will be over turned.
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
We can also vote to get rid of the Senate leader and move on to someone willing to get the job done.
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
I heard that if it is not done soon it'll be too late. Primary season
is here so we need the time to implement things.
We need to add pressure to our politicians and we need to primary the
sh!t out of the RINOs.
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
It's because of people like Nancy Pelosi amd Dianne Feinstein to
mention a few. The decades, almost centuries of fraud set the
precedent for other to follow. MTG worth millions, Omar, and the list goes on and on.
Now we have governors looking the other way for fraud being committed BILLIONS and BILLIONS and the politicians just shrug their shoulders
when asked about it.
We are screwed if we don't fix this.
Now they don't care because there are no consequences for their
actions.
Isn't the filibuster an amendment though? Wouldn't the senate have to
vote on it? There's no way out until we have a bigger majority (unless
I'm missing something.)
I agree with that too though. If Trump wants it to get voted on, then Thune should take a vote on it. When we see the end of this predicament we'll know exactly who to blame, one way or the other.
Right. Thune is weak. I know that if I were GOP majority leader in the senate then I wouldn't rest until I had everyone's vote on this. They'd either be saving America or they'd be on a "definitely primary" list.
Friend, you are setting yourself up for a fell for it again award. Far
be it for me to stop you.
I haven't laughed that hard in a while, thanks for that. Like hell they will. And any Dem that doesn't hold him accountable is getting their
balls nailed to the wall by me and all the peeps I know. This era of domestic brutalism, corruption and corporate cronyism must end, and we must build working systems for the American people. No more pussyfooting around and wishy washy neo-liberalism and neo-conservatism.
But they won't remove a Senate leader who's protecting them.
And you don't have to stop me.
Isn't the filibuster an amendment though? Wouldn't the senate have to vote on it? There's no way out until we have a bigger majority (unles I'm missing something.)
Senate RULES... Recall Senator Harry as the Senate majority leader during Barry's stint in office??
So, it's, not a bad thing to go to a Speaking Filibuster, we had it for the majority of our existence. Mind you when the Senate first made the rule the Democrats didn't hate America and had policies more than
"Orange Man Bad".
Right. Thune is weak. I know that if I were GOP majority leader in th senate then I wouldn't rest until I had everyone's vote on this. They either be saving America or they'd be on a "definitely primary" list.
They need to vote to get rid of him.
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
But they won't remove a Senate leader who's protecting them.
I think it only takes 5 votes... Senator Lindsay Graham is Gay for
war... maybe he'll take on this battle.
So the senate did this to themselves, and they have the power to fix it? And Thune has no ambition to fix it? That's a failure.
It sounds better than what we have now. But a filibuster of any sort contradicts democracy.
I never heard of Thune until the 2024 elections. Was he the "minority leader" prior to the 2024 elections? There have been many more outspoken GOP senators who deserve the position more than he does.
They are only "for" war when they will benefit from it. And I don't
think they are benefiting from this one.
So the senate did this to themselves, and they have the power to fix And Thune has no ambition to fix it? That's a failure.
Yes, a vote. Recall Kevin McCarthy?? That's how they ousted him. I think they need 5 people to table the vote and a simple majority to replace him.
Since F**k Nuts has us deadlocked on a 80/20 issue we might as well be deadlocked trying to replace him.
Yes and no, it was implemented to allow the minority to voice their
views on a bill.
President can veto a bill and send it back to the Senate, the Senate overrides the veto with 60 votes.
So, in comes the Zombie Filibuster and THIS is a threat to democracy. It requires a 60 person vote... and now they run off to face the TV cameras blaming each other.
I saw Thume on TV today saying the Democrats talking points... He's
being paid off.
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
I think we'll get over this. but we need to PRIMARY the sh!t out of
these RINOs.
So, in comes the Zombie Filibuster a
THIS is a threat to democracy. It
requires a 60 person vote... and now
It would be interesting to see where the other GOP senators stand on keeping Thune as majority leader. I'd also be interested in knowing why they chose him in the first place.
Thank you for explaining that. That makes sense; if an overwhelming majority of Senators want something done, the president can't stand in their way. It seems like a good idea until this happens:
So with that being said, there should be no filibuster. Being a political minority means being a loser, and senators fitting that description shouldn't have special accommodations (filibuster.)
That sucks. I was excited with the 2024 and 2025 election results, but deep down I knew not to expect much legislation to happen.
I hope so. We need to finish pushing the Democrats off the cliff so
they can never regain power.
Then we can focus on getting rid of the RINOs.
I'm a lefty but this is a point I agree
on actually. The last thing I want is
for you cats to get your agenda across;
however, this bein a democracy, the
GOP did win the last elections and thus
should have the ability to get their
agenda across, however painful and
fucked I think it is. The back and
forth of congress is supposed to be
healthy and responsive, and the current
filibuster destroys that for both
parties, so that no voter ever feels
that they get the changes you voted
for.
In 1975 they moved things down from 2/3rds (67) to 60... That 1975
2/3rds was a rule passed some time ago.
Important takeaway... This is a Senate Rule and with a simple majority
to make changes. The Speaking Filibuster as I described was the way it was since the beginning of time and it was in place to give the minority
a voice.
Senator Kennedy was talking about pushing it through the process of reconciliation, a way they can do it with 50+1 votes.
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
We have an 85/15 split on this bill its funny AF that political people buck the voters.
but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such
Regulations...
The Save America Act can/should be seen as a REGULATION!!! Whereby the States use the regulation to guide them.
Politicians LIE all the time.
Aaron Thomas wrote to IB Joe <=-
Your description still makes sense, but the precept doesn't make sense
to me. It's equates to "Even if the majority wants something, the
minority still has the opportunity to take it away from them."
It's like if I hired a mechanic to make my car go faster, but then I'm required by law to take it to another mechanic who will make it go
slower.
Yup. Hence why they don't want it.
SAFE means that the Elitists can't
choose which candidate gets 'elected
Simple example: A majority of a town votes to allow anyone to take any
car for use and forces people to leave their keys in the car. A judge
can come in and rule that the new law is unconstitutional and strike it down.
Just because the majority want to do something doesn't mean it's right or legal.
Oklahoma's recent anti-trans license
bill jut instantaneously invalidated
a small chunk of voter's driver's
I just want to point out that Oklaho
is MAGA country and Trump won 100% o
Oklahoma's counties, and it's absurd
for an outspoken leftist to cry abou
voters in Oklahoma. You're grasping
straws.
Your description still makes sense, but the precept doesn't make sense
to me. It's equates to "Even if the majority wants something, the
minority still has the opportunity to take it away from them."
I like that guy and I hope he can help make this happen.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
The majority shouldn't be allowed to do something illegal, but I think
the majority should be allowed to change a law.
is MAGA country and Trump won 100% o
Oklahoma's counties, and it's absurd
for an outspoken leftist to cry abou
voters in Oklahoma. You're grasping
straws.
It is never absurd to speak out about
the government doing wrong to people.
The majority of cats in the South
in the 19th century wanted slavery.
It was still wrong.
Senator Kennedy said it best...
Paraphrasing... Complete geniuses
founded the country and now idiots a
in charge of it now.
Ex: Muslims have invaded many areas
the U.S. In those areas, they are t
majority. If we had a simple "major
rule", then the minorities would
suffer.
But have you spoken to these "trans
people in Oklahoma" who had their
drivers licenses revoked? Have you h
any updates from them lately? (You
should give them a call and check on
them in case they are having trouble
getting around.)
He, like many others, ought first
to start by glancing at a mirror.
But have you spoken to these "trans
people in Oklahoma" who had their
drivers licenses revoked? Have you h
any updates from them lately? (You
should give them a call and check on
them in case they are having trouble
getting around.)
Have you spoken to any of your anglo
friends in Minnesota who have had
their jobs allegedly stolen by
fraudulent illegal Somalians? You
should probably give them your money.
Don't talk sh!t about Senator
Kennedy!!!
I never claimed to give a crap about
anyone from Minnesota.
You don't think that Democrat
supporters have any photo ID? So
they'll be forced to not vote? How m
transgendered voters do you figure t
have in Oklahoma? If they can't get
driver's license then they can at le
get a US passport, if voting is
important to them.
Make voting harder, put obstacles in
the way, and eventually you bleed off
| Sysop: | deepend |
|---|---|
| Location: | Calgary, Alberta |
| Users: | 296 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 05:17:55 |
| Calls: | 2,510 |
| Files: | 5,731 |
| D/L today: |
46 files (12,828K bytes) |
| Messages: | 464,250 |