Things aren't looking good for the DOJ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_L7olFiet4
Things aren't looking good for the DOJ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_L7olFiet4
Seriously?
Things are looking fine for the DOJ. This is just another MAGA GOP whistleblower like so many before.
Things are looking fine for the DOJ. This is just another MAGA GOP
whistleblower like so many before.
Then you didn't see the video... Kevin McCarthy, speaker of the house and the one who can table the impeachment process, is the one who said they may be going through with it.
They have documents proving that Garland may have lied under oath to congress. What the GOP is DOING is that they are subpoenaing 6 people
related to the evidence. Someone is lying... and if the facts bare out and they can prove Garland lied... he should be impeached...
WTF happened.... I thought you guys LOVED whistle-blowers...
There is no such document.
WTF happened.... I thought you guys LOVED whistle-blowers...
Sure, if they are in fact whistleblowers.
There is no such document.
Document... email... refutes Garland's assertion that Delaware prosecutor had full autonomy in the Biden case.... The document is all over the news... They are subpoenaing 6 individuals about said email....
Can't fix stupidWTF happened.... I thought you guys LOVED whistle-blowers...
Sure, if they are in fact whistleblowers.
Just so you know. I have not seen this in the news. It must be your
right wing bubble.
ongress.Things are looking fine for the DOJ. This is just another MAGA GOP whistleblower like so many before.
They have documents proving that Garland may have lied under oath to
hat the GOP is DOING is that they are subpoenaing 6 people related to thevid
ce. Someone is lying... and if the facts bare out and they can prove Garland ed... he should be impeached...
WTF happened.... I thought you guys LOVED whistle-blowers...
They have documents proving that Garland may have lied under oath to congress. What the GOP is DOING is that they are subpoenaing 6 people related to the evidence. Someone is lying... and if the facts bare out and they can prove Garland lied... he should be impeached...
There is no such document.
Just so you know. I have not seen this in the news. It must be your
right wing bubble.
New whistle blower today confirming the other one...
https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1673763732642471949?s=20
Brand new today!!!!
There is no such document.
Where is your proof? Link please.
Things aren't looking good for the DOJ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_L7olFiet4
Seriously?
Things are looking fine for the DOJ. This is just another MAGA GOP whistleblower like so many before.
Then you didn't see the video...
Kevin McCarthy, speaker of the house and the one who can table the impeachment process,
is the one who said they may be going through with it.
They have documents proving that Garland may have lied under oath to congress.
What the GOP is DOING is that they are subpoenaing 6 people related to the evidence. Someone is lying... and if the facts bare out and they can prove
Garland lied... he should be impeached...
There is no such document.
Document... email... refutes Garland's assertion that Delaware prosecutor had full autonomy in the Biden case.... The document is all over the news...
They are subpoenaing 6 individuals about said email....
WTF happened.... I thought you guys LOVED whistle-blowers...
Sure, if they are in fact whistleblowers.
Can't fix stupid
Can't fix stupid
That is apparently so.
You are not going to get anything of any real value from Kevin.
New whistle blower today confirming the other one...
Yeah, I was surprised he cast shade on whistleblowers, too.
There is no such document.
Where is your proof? Link please.
IB Joe wrote to Alan Ianson <=-
WTF happened.... I thought you guys LOVED whistle-blowers...
Yeah, I was surprised he cast shade on whistleblowers, too.
Brand new today!!!!
I just more allegations Joe. A brand new allegation.
Tell us why he wants to expunge the TWO impeachments
of Donald J. Trump. You do realize pretending impeachments
never happened does not change the facts.
While you are at it, tell us why he allowed the House to censor
Adam Schiff, while refusing to call for the censure of George Santos -
who has been charged with several criminal counts.
And yet he would allow his far-right colleagues to present articles
of impeachment against Joe Biden - despite no evidence of wrongdoing.
And while at it, attempt to hide the two impeachments of Donald Trump.
As if they never happened at all.
The investigation is over. All they could come up with was two
misdemeanor tax charges, and one charge of illegal gun possession
- that will be expunged from his record.
Big fucking deal. Hillary Clinton is the most investigated woman
in America, and Hunter Biden will become the most investigated man
in America. With neither one of them being put in jail for a damn
thing.
Meanwhile, your boy George Santos, who has been indicted on several criminal counts, continues on as a full-fledged member of Congress,
never being censored for anything under Speaker McCarthy's universe.
With the Ignorant Elitists, it's always "Rules for thee, but not for me."
I just more allegations Joe. A brand new allegation.
No... I swear you don't watch the videos....
NOT NEW or MORE allegations but rather more support to the claims from the first whistleblower. Both people support each other's claims and both have brought receipts... supporting emails, meetings, paper trails and the like.
Closing your eyes and covering your ears and going LA LA LA LA while evidence is piling up against a corrupt DOJ isn't going to make things go away.
There is no such document.
Where is your proof? Link please.
There are no links to documents that don't exist.
This has been allegations from the start.
There are no links to documents that don't exist.
But you are trying to prove it *doesn't* exist. Most of us are smart enough not to just take your word for it.
Joe already provided a link that discusses its existence. I am asking you
to prove it does not exist. Otherwise, you words are one of those "big nothingburgers" you like to talk about so much.
This has been allegations from the start.
All things not yet proven are allegations. That is what these hearings are for.
This has been allegations from the start.
I am not closing my eyes. There simply is no evidence, Joe. None.
On 06-28-23 09:56, Ib Joe <=-
spoke to Lee Lofaso about Re: GARLAND IMPEACHMENT <=-
Well the 2 impeachments were politically motivated, not because of
wrong doings, per se. Lets tackle the first one... They went
after Trump for Russia/Ukraine collusion scandal... There
wasn't enough evidence to support the house claims for
impeachment, senate's vote never met the 67 votes needed.
Moreover, and more important, the Durham report showed that
there was no collusion... The Muller report also said the
same... for the most part... Er go... There was NO
evidence of collusion so the first impeachment should not
have been brought.
The second impeachment... They say Trump incited an
insurrection... and there wasn't enough evidence to support
that as well... no 67 votes in the senate.
Just because there were some bad actors there... planted by
the FBI and CIA.. and other stupid people who did not
represent their cause correctly... Does not and did not
make Trump and insighter of an insurrection....
When things went south at the capital Trump did tell everyone to go
home.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZB8kjR4nYzk
of an impeachable offense.... BUT... the day I was hearing
this the WhatsApp message came out.... and he said.... if
this is provable... what was stated in the message... THATS
impeachable.
After watching the riots with glee for three+ hours.
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
On 28 Jun 2023, Ron L. said the following...
With the Ignorant Elitists, it's always "Rules for thee, but not for me."
I just spent a portion of my morning responding to this mindset
You are totally wrong about what that first impeachment was all about.
It had nothing to do with Russia. It had to do with Trump blackmailing the Ukraine President to force him to produce dirt on Biden, or else
Trump would not release the military aid that congress had approved.
It was well known that there would never be 67 votes in the Senate now that most Senators are voting on strict party lines instead of voting their conscience. Even so, there were a moderate number of Republican Senators who did vote for impeachment.
I have seen no evidence of plants by FBI or CIA. Have you?
A. what is WhatsApp? B. what was in that message?
Which is why I don't bother responding to the Ignorant Elitists anymore.
It's just a waste of time and energy.
noughThere are no links to documents that don't exist.
But you are trying to prove it *doesn't* exist. Most of us are smart
not to just take your word for it.
No, I am saying there is no evidence of a crime.
of an impeachable offense.... BUT... the day I was hearing
this the WhatsApp message came out.... and he said.... if
this is provable... what was stated in the message... THATS
impeachable.
A. what is WhatsApp? B. what was in that message?
He released the aide in time, as per the legislators agreement. Trump had a few questions before it was released.... AND MAN-O-MAN how is that turning out.
Looks like the Biden crime family is embroiled in a corruption scheme
with the the same leader. Is the Big Guy getting 10% of all the current "aide"?
Impeachment is important process. DON'T FUCK WITH IT!!! Impeachment is a process used to remove someone from office so that they may face allegations a described in the constitution.
The GOP want to expunge his second impeachment based on this fact. Trump doesn't care ab out the impeachments. He wears them like a badge of honor... Every rally he has... every email I get for campaign contributions he states that the government is after me.... but he's in the way...
The only problem I have/had with the shame impeachments is that the bar was lowered to cover political issues now.
There is lots of evidence .... You're too busy closing your eyes, plugging your ears and going LA LA LA LA LA. Congress has setup a comity to look into the weaponization of government agencies... FBI is front and center.
| There is no such document.
"There is no such document" is exactly what you said.
So prove there is no document, or prove that the document contains no evidence.
There is no such document.
Where is your proof? Link please.
There are no links to documents that don't exist.
But you are trying to prove it *doesn't* exist. Most of us are smart enough
not to just take your word for it.
Joe already provided a link that discusses its existence.
I am asking you to prove it does not exist.
Otherwise, you words are one of those "big nothingburgers" you like to talk
about so much.
This has been allegations from the start.
All things not yet proven are allegations. That is what these hearings are
for.
Questions? No, Donald Trump wanted dirt on Biden.
It's more dirt on Biden, without evidence.
It is important and the republican party should have taken it seriously.
There is no such thing as expunging an impeachment, not in reality.
This is congress weaponizing government.
Questions? No, Donald Trump wanted dirt on Biden.
There seems to be a lot of dirt on the Biden crime family.
Could you imagine if Don Jr. was a crackhead and left a laptop full of the same garbage Hunter's laptop had??
Could you also imagine if Ivanka left a diary at a rehab clinic
talking about how her father use to shower with her, inappropriately I might add, and how that contributed to her over sexualized youth.
Could you imagine if Trump setup shell companies to receive 10's of millions of dollars from American adversaries, distribute that amongst his family member, including grandchildren.... If this was the case he'd be in jail right now... as he should be...
The US justice system is corrupt...
It's more dirt on Biden, without evidence.
There is evidence, every time someone says/shows you evidence you start with the closing of your eyes... plugging your ears and doing the LA LA LA thing.
If what they say is NOT true why not release all the documents and go to a court so the American people can see the evidence.
The committees looking into this said TODAY.... they are --><-- this close in determining if AG Garland had lied, recall last week 6 subpoenas were sent out 1 of those 6 are lying...They say things don't look good for the AG.
BTW, I don't think he'll be impeached but rather he'll step down or someone in the Deep State will get Biden to fire him.
It is important and the republican party should have taken it seriously.
It was the Democrats who have misused the Impeachment process... Though an impeachment was voted on... notice how they are not rushing things... they are making sure there is the evidence to support their claims.
There is no such thing as expunging an impeachment, not in reality.
Let them vote on it... and see what the courts say... Trump doesn't seem to mind and public sees it for what it is... political.
This is congress weaponizing government.
You should read the constitution.... I'll help you... Article I, Section 8, Clause 18
Tell us why he wants to expunge the TWO impeachments
of Donald J. Trump. You do realize pretending impeachments
never happened does not change the facts.
Well the 2 impeachments were politically motivated,
not because of wrong doings, per se.
Lets tackle the first one... They went after Trump for Russia/Ukraine collusion scandal... There wasn't enough evidence to support the house claims for impeachment, senate's vote never met the 67 votes needed. Moreover, and more important, the Durham report showed that there was no collusion... The Muller report also said the same... for the most part... Er go... There was NO evidence of collusion so the first impeachment should
not have been brought.
The second impeachment... They say Trump incited an insurrection... and there wasn't enough evidence to support that as well... no 67 votes in the senate.
What they did find was Trump saying that people should go to the Capital and
protest "PEACEFULLY & PATRIOTICALLY", there is the first amendment that covers this...
Just because there were some bad actors there...
planted by the FBI and CIA..
and other stupid people who did not represent their cause correctly...
Does not and did not make Trump and insighter of an insurrection....
When things went south at the capital Trump did tell everyone to go home.
The evidence that the January 6th comity is showing that they were biased. A new one should be be conducted without the bias...
I personally think Trump should wear his impeachments like a badge of honor....
they were politically motivated and it helps him with his narrative...
The Deep State are after the citizens and he's just standing in the way...
The Democrats have lowered the threshold so much on impeachment their will be impeachments every other month now... what a shame
While you are at it, tell us why he allowed the House to censor
Adam Schiff, while refusing to call for the censure of George Santos -
who has been charged with several criminal counts.
There are some differences here...
I think I made myself clear here...
I wasn't up for the removal of Adam Shift, even though I thought he deserved
it...
for 2 reasons...
1 and it's the BIGGEST reason...
it's not in the constitution and it's a bad president...
kinda like lowering the standards for impeachment.
2, let the voters who vote these people in vote them out if they want.
That's what a representative government looks like...
The reason Representatives are voted in every 2 years is so that their constituents can hold them accountable and vote them out.
So, Mr. Santos did not, at least so far, abused his position he was elected
for.
To my understanding, he lied and whatnot to get into his position....
Who knew politicians night lie to get into office... that's a new one.
Whereas Adam Schiff misused his position and lied to the American public to
further a political narrative that was a LIE.
In both cases I felt that their constituents should vote them in or out.
Maybe Mr. Santos will get voted out in 2024... maybe not.
Maybe Mr. Schiff will get the senate seat he's looking for...
maybe not...
Let his constituents determine that.
And yet he would allow his far-right colleagues to present articles
of impeachment against Joe Biden - despite no evidence of wrongdoing.
And while at it, attempt to hide the two impeachments of Donald Trump.
As if they never happened at all.
Excuse me sir... There is EVIDENCE for Biden's impeachment...
I think Lauren Bobert was a little too premature in pushing the vote.
Her angle on the impeachment was that Biden was failing to keep up his duties outined in Article II of the constitution... Some of her focus is on the open boarder and other things.
She claimed that Biden is not respecting the laws implemented by the legislators...
I was listening Alan Dershowitz talk on Boberts impeachment theory...
He said what Biden has done in this realm was not at the level of an impeachable offense....
BUT...
the day I was hearing this the WhatsApp message came out....
and he said....
if this is provable...
what was stated in the message... THATS impeachable.
Kevin McCarthy said they are exploring this...
Looking into finding more financial records and telephone records...
to see if Joe's phone was pinging next to Hunter during the infamous WhatsApp message.
There has been more WhatsApp messages revealed since. If there is evidence
of these pay for play schemes then I think they should go for it.
But since the Democrats completely trashed the true reason for impeachment I
expect Impeachment to be brought on every president 3 or 4 times a year because their feelings are hurt.
The investigation is over. All they could come up with was two
misdemeanor tax charges, and one charge of illegal gun possession
- that will be expunged from his record.
I'm almost certain you don't watch the news...
Because of all these things going on about Hunter...
The judge sitting over Hunter's case has put his decision to formalize/finalize Hunter's plea deal...
BECAUSE there is evidence that the DOJ was interfering in the case.
Hunter may have to, at some point, face the music like any of us would have
to.
Big fucking deal. Hillary Clinton is the most investigated woman
in America, and Hunter Biden will become the most investigated man
in America. With neither one of them being put in jail for a damn
thing.
Doesn't make things right... because she's connected with the elites she skates...
Meanwhile, your boy George Santos, who has been indicted on several
criminal counts, continues on as a full-fledged member of Congress,
never being censored for anything under Speaker McCarthy's universe.
What did Mr. Santos do, after he was sworn into office, that I'm unaware of... ??
On 06-29-23 08:30, Steve Wolf <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Trump impeachment <=-
After watching the riots with glee for three+ hours.
It was pretty cool wasn't it. ??
On 06-29-23 08:57, Ib Joe <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Trump impeachment <=-
Trump was out of office on January 6th and could face
whatever charges that were alleged. There was no need to
impeach... BUT WAIT... there might have been. The
democrats didn't want to face him again in 2024 so they
went ahead with the impeachment... even though it was
unconstitutional.
On 06-29-23 15:39, Mike Powell <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Trump impeachment <=-
A. what is WhatsApp? B. what was in that message?
A phone application that some people use to send texts because it is supposedly more secure than sending the same text via the default
texting application that comes with the phone.
A phone application that some people use to send texts because it is supposedly more secure than sending the same text via the default texting application that comes with the phone.
Thanks for that info. Now, does anyone know what was in the message
referred to?
Impeachment is important process. DON'T FUCK WITH IT!!!
Impeachment is a process used to remove someone from office so that they may
face allegations as described in the constitution.
Trump was out of office on January 6th and could face whatever charges that
were alleged.
There was no need to impeach...
The GOP want to expunge his second impeachment based on this fact.
Trump doesn't care ab out the impeachments. He wears them like a badge of honor...
Every rally he has... every email I get for campaign contributions he states
that the government is after me.... but he's in the way...
The only problem I have/had with the shame impeachments is that the bar was
lowered to cover political issues now.
The house voted to impeach Joe Biden over the way he's running the open boarder, plus a few other things.
Trump was successfully impeached. Twice. In the same term.
The crimes committed were outlined in the articles of impeachment.
Trial was held in the Senate on each impeachment.
According to the House all counts were acts of wrong doing,
as outlined in the US Constitution.
Paul Manafort, campaign manager for Donald Trump. Convicted. And
then later pardoned by Trump (as president). That is all the evidence needed to show collusion.
After the House impeached Trump, the Senate held trial. The bogus
claim of 67 votes needed for removal from office is easy to refute,
as the US Constitution says two thirds of those voting (present).
Which could be any number of Senators, even a majority being absent.
The prosecution made its case in the Senate, the defense never
bothered to a rebuttal or response of any kind. Every Senator knew
Trump was guilty of sin, and nobody wanted to embarrass themselves publicly by claiming otherwise.
How, pray tell, does one go about to represent their cause correctly?
Egging an angry mob onward to hang Mike Pence and assassinate
Nancy Pelosi is a criminal act. Some would call it sedition.
Speaker McCarthy wants to expunge both of Trump's impeachments from
the record. That makes you an enemy of the state. And you know what
that means.
Maybe Santos will be found "guilty" and be sentenced to prison
before the next election. Of course, Speaker McCarthy can pull the
plug on Santos being a member of the House anytime he wants ...
What did Mr. Santos do, after he was sworn into office, that I'm unaw of... ??
He plead "not guilty" to 13 criminal counts this morning.
I'll spare you the details.
Trump was not yet out of office until January 20th. They came closer to getting a positive vote than on the first impeachment -- which would
have barred him from holding any federal office in the future.
Trump was successfully impeached. Twice. In the same term.
The crimes committed were outlined in the articles of impeachment.
Trial was held in the Senate on each impeachment.
Hen was impeached twice... I understand that... twice... House voted for it
and all it takes is a simple majority to do so...
Senate had a trial... twice, once for each impeachment....
and Twice the senate cleared him on all the allegations twice.
According to the House all counts were acts of wrong doing,
as outlined in the US Constitution.
House can say whatever...
the reason there is a trial is so the house can prove those allegations...
and they weren't proven and he was cleared twice by the senate.
Paul Manafort, campaign manager for Donald Trump. Convicted. And
then later pardoned by Trump (as president). That is all the evidence
needed to show collusion.
Paul Manaford found guilty on charges Hunter should be charged for and isn't, so far.
Paul Manaford was targeted for political reason and was pardoned because of
the that. Presidents can pardon... that's what they do
After the House impeached Trump, the Senate held trial. The bogus
claim of 67 votes needed for removal from office is easy to refute,
as the US Constitution says two thirds of those voting (present).
Which could be any number of Senators, even a majority being absent.
That's not true... By LAW all have to be present for the trial and vote...
The prosecution made its case in the Senate, the defense never
bothered to a rebuttal or response of any kind. Every Senator knew
Trump was guilty of sin, and nobody wanted to embarrass themselves
publicly by claiming otherwise.
If the case was made they would have voted that way...
but it wasn't and he was cleared.
How, pray tell, does one go about to represent their cause correctly?
Read the first amendment...
Egging an angry mob onward to hang Mike Pence and assassinate
Nancy Pelosi is a criminal act. Some would call it sedition.
The only one egging people on was Ray Epp, a government plant.
Speaker McCarthy wants to expunge both of Trump's impeachments from
the record. That makes you an enemy of the state. And you know what
that means.
It has been shown that the 1st impeachment was political, and unconstitutional...
Where as the second was the same...
This one was/is seen as unconstitutional because...
you don't impeach someone who is already out of office...
you impeach someone to remove them from office.
Let McCarthy and the house vote...
make public why they believe what they believe and let public sour this out...
BTW, you keep saying that Trump was impeached....
Had Trump actually been impeached he wouldn't be able to run in 2024... or even 2020 for that matter.
House voted to impeach...
Senate cleared him of all wrong doing...
Maybe Santos will be found "guilty" and be sentenced to prison
before the next election. Of course, Speaker McCarthy can pull the
plug on Santos being a member of the House anytime he wants ...
What you just said here is NOT true...
McCarthy cannot, and should not, remove someone from the house.
One... it's not in the constitution...
please help me here and quote the section of the constitution that allows him to do so...
Adam Schiff is someone that deserved to be removed because he abused his office while he was elected...
He wasn't and should not have been because of this...
and it's a big one!!!!!
As a representative government people voted that person to represent them....
and it's not up to Kevin McCarthy to over-rule that.
So Mr. Santos may have to go to trial, for whatever lies he committed and if
he is found guilty he can pay whatever fine... or whatever and he can still
run and get re-elected.
I think if you hold all politicians to this "Santos" standard about 85% will
have to step-down
unawWhat did Mr. Santos do, after he was sworn into office, that I'm
of... ??
He plead "not guilty" to 13 criminal counts this morning.
I'll spare you the details.
In America you have a trial where the allegations have to be proven... In America you are INNOCENT until proven otherwise in court.
BTW, I just looked... actually just looked at the constitution and there is
not clause about having to step down if you lied of had criminal allegations levied against you.
BTW, again... Trump may get re-elected in 2024 and have an ankle monitor on...
maybe even have to see his probation officer once a week....
BECAUSE there is NO clause stopping ANY person running for and winning... that has a criminal past.
The constitution says that people who ware impeached cannot run for office though....
Trump was not yet out of office until January 20th. They came closerto
getting a positive vote than on the first impeachment -- which would
have barred him from holding any federal office in the future.
This is true... Close only counts in Hand-grenades and not impeachments. The magic number is 67, not 66 or lower.
Bill Clinton was also impeached. Once.
As was Andrew Johnson. Once.
The only POTUS ever to be put to trial twice. And in one term.
All in due accordance with the US Constitution.
The House doesn't have to prove shit. All it has to do is make allegations. Point fingers and accuse. If a majority vote "Yes"
the article is passed. Until all articles have been voted on.
The man has already publicly admitted that he lied in order to get
elected into office. That itself should be enough for him to resign
from office. But he adamantly refuses to do so, even though he is
guilty as sin (of all counts charged) as well as being a bona fide
liar. Speaker McCarthy refuses to call for his expulsion from the
House, and no effort has even been made to censure him. The man
is a total disgrace - to himself, his constituents, and to this
entire country.
This is true... Close only counts in Hand-grenades and not impeachmen The magic number is 67, not 66 or lower.
Two thirds of those presesnt, moron.
IB Joe wrote to Lee Lofaso <=-
It has been shown that the 1st impeachment was political, and unconstitutional... Where as the second was the same... This one was/is seen as unconstitutional because... you don't impeach someone who is already out of office... you impeach someone to remove them from
office.
The problem is that Lee really doesn't understand much. And because he thinks he's an expert, he doesn't try to learn.
For the Ignorant Elitists out there:
One of the things that the Founding Fathers realized is that the law
could be misused against a sitting representative.
Ex: Big vote coming up, and one side trumps up charges against the swing vote rep. The law hauls him off to jail. The vote happens, but swings the other way because the one rep is in jail. Then the charges are dropped because they weren't valid in the first place. But the damage
was done.
(Doesn't this sort of sound familiar today?)
Hence the process for impeaching first. A successful impeachment means removal from office. Then they can be put in jail.
It has been shown that the 1st impeachment was political, and
unconstitutional... Where as the second was the same... This one was/is
seen as unconstitutional because... you don't impeach someone who is
already out of office... you impeach someone to remove them from
office.
The problem is that Lee really doesn't understand much. And because he thinks he's an expert, he doesn't try to learn.
Hence the process for impeaching first.
A successful impeachment means removal from office.
Then they can be put in jail.
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
I try to show the same restraint for both sides... I see what Schiff
did while he was in office as being a HUGE crime... While he was in
office no less... Is there somewhere in the constitution that states
you can sideline a representative because he's a criminal... NOPE there isn't...
Well, the keep going at Trump with Lawfare
The left should just meet on the battlefield of ideas and debate the
ideas of their platform...
Yes, there is. I posted that in a previous message.
Plus there's the impeachment process - which can be used against a
sitting congress-critter as well as a President.
And, of course, there's the Recall process.
But, by design, those processes have checks and balances to prevent one side from using the legal system against a sitting gov't rep for
political purposes.
Well, the keep going at Trump with Lawfare
Which shows how corrupt the whole system is. Most of these people need
to go ... to jail.
The left should just meet on the battlefield of ideas and debate the ideas of their platform...
They can't win that way. They don't believe in objective truth. They have no facts. They have no arguments. All they have is insults and, according to some videos I've seen, barking to drown out the other side.
And is yet another reason I don't bother responding to the Ignorant Elitists here.
Impeachment is forever.
On 07-04-23 08:40, Ron L. <=-
spoke to Ib Joe about Re: GARLAND IMPEACHMENT <=-
They can't win that way. They don't believe in objective truth. They have no facts. They have no arguments. All they have is insults and, according to some videos I've seen, barking to drown out the other
side.
That paragraph is a perfect description of the Trump MAGA right wing republicans.
That paragraph is a perfect description of the Trump MAGA right wing
republicans.
the absolute best you have is "no you" ? lol
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
Back to Garland... I think if they have sufficient evidence to impeach him... He'll resign or Biden will fire him before the trial so they
can keep the evidence a secret.
We'd loose about 85% of congress and the senate... And a good
percentage of the US government work force.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Lee Lofaso <=-
Impeachment is forever.
Accusations are forever, but there's nothing "successful" about an impeachment that doesn't lead to a conviction.
Alexander Grotewohl wrote to Dale Shipp <=-
That paragraph is a perfect description of the Trump MAGA right wing republicans.
the absolute best you have is "no you" ? lol
That paragraph is a perfect description of the Trump MAGA right wing
republicans.
the absolute best you have is "no you" ? lol
Dale didn't say "no you".
Dale's point was simple, concise, on point, and true.
Impeachment is forever.
Accusations are forever, but there's nothing "successful" about an impeachment that doesn't lead to a conviction.
The term is "copium".
Lee has to continue to push the lie to cope with the fact that he's
wrong.
| This article refers to the messages as "alleged." Since this story was | printed,
| Hunter's attorney has issued a statement. That statement
does not claim that
| the messages are not authentic, but rather that they were
disclosed illegally
| and that the messages are the words of "an addict."
Note the last paragraph. Hunter's attorney does not deny their existence.
We don't know that dad was there for sure.
That was my thought also. Was this while Hunter was using?
ccusesIB Joe wrote to Lee Lofaso <=-
In America you have a trial where the allegations have to be proven... In America you are INNOCENT until proven otherwise in court.
But in Clown World (i.e. Lee's "reality"), you are guilty when someone
you.
because he's a criminal... NOPE there isn't... Can you alter their wage byev
ng a fine.... Well it does say that you can't alter their wage betweenlectio
... SO NO... the house does not have that authority ... even though Schiffne
what he was doing was costing the tax payers millions and was wrong... So,he
censured him... Santos didn't do anything like Schiff... Anything Santos dido
did before becoming elected... If the constituents of any of these people
them back in... let them do it.
Dale didn't say "no you".
Dale's point was simple, concise, on point, and true.
Dale is a good guy, but his description was a vague pile of generalizations.
The media is trying to normalize terms like "MAGA Republicans," but it's not a thing.
There's only 1 kind of conservative in the USA, and it's the kind that votes Republican. Don't let others fool you with historical jargon.
We'd loose about 85% of congress and the senate... And a good percentage of the US government work force.
And that's a bad thing? 8)
There were some folks mad at the Republicans who voted against it the first time, but they were correct it would not hold up in court so there was no reason to pursue that avenue.
Unfortunately, Schiff's probably will vote him back in. What Santos did was before he got elected. However, I think the more important question is whether or not what he did helped him get elected. If so, there is probably at least an ethics violation in there somewhere.
I try to show the same restraint for both sides... I see what Schiff
did while he was in office as being a HUGE crime... While he was in
office no less... Is there somewhere in the constitution that states
you can sideline a representative because he's a criminal... NOPE there
isn't...
Yes, there is. I posted that in a previous message.
Plus there's the impeachment process - which can be used against a sitting congress-critter as well as a President.
And, of course, there's the Recall process.
But, by design, those processes have checks and balances to prevent one side
from using the legal system against a sitting gov't rep for political purposes.
But, by design, those processes have checks and balances to prevent oneside from using the legal system against a sitting gov't rep for political purposes.
I agree with you...
Because it takes 2/3 vote in the senate to seal the deal
I just don't think there would be enough votes to take Garland out.... Or
Santos or Schiff...
I think the Democrat party is too partisan to get a 2/3 vote in the senate.
I just think the people should vote their representatives in or out.
Back to Garland...
I think if they have sufficient evidence to impeach him...
He'll resign or Biden will fire him before the trial so they can keep the evidence a secret.
Well, the keep going at Trump with Lawfare
Which shows how corrupt the whole system is. Most of these people need
to go ... to jail.
We'd loose about 85% of congress and the senate... And a good percentage of
the US government work force.
Impeachment is forever.
Accusations are forever, but there's nothing "successful" about an
impeachment that doesn't lead to a conviction.
The term is "copium".
Lee has to continue to push the lie to cope with the fact that he's wrong.
Impeachment is forever.
Accusations are forever, but there's nothing "successful" about an impeachment that doesn't lead to a conviction.
I "successfully" lifted the toilet seat, but I still managed to get piss on
it.
There were some folks mad at the Republicans who voted against MP>it thefirst time, but they were correct it would not hold up in MP>court so there
was no reason to pursue that avenue.
There was 3 different votes on Schiff...
1) There was a vote to expel him from the house, ...
2) There was a vote to fine Schiff $16,000,000.00,
3) There was a vote to censure Schiff...
and that made it...
So someone looked at Schiff and said in a stern voice.... Stop doing that...
That was it... At the end the representatives voted in a way that was constitutional and it made a point.
Unfortunately, Schiff's probably will vote him back in.
What Santos did was before he got elected.
However, I think the more important question is whether or not MP>what hedid helped him get elected.
If so, there is probably at least an ethics violation in there
somewhere.
Whatever...
maybe someone should review Nancy Pelosi's stock transactions...
I'm not sure what politician has said one thing to get elected and then did
the exact opposite when they got into office.
There are laws out there if you or I lie to congress we go to jail... but if
congress lies to us... it's OK... just politics...
Dale is a good guy, but his description was a vague pile of generalizati
What was vague? He was direct and to the point.
Accusations are forever, but there's nothing "successful" about an impeachment that doesn't lead to a conviction.
Once articles of impeachment are passed (by simple majority)
they become ingrained as part of history and can never be removed.
Kind of like a permanent stain that can never be erased.
Once the dunce cap of impeachment is placed on a president's head
it stays put forever. Trump is the only president in history who successfully donned two of them on top of his orange head at the
same time. Not really sure it is possible for anybody to make it
three.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
That, or someone gives them a nickel for every Trump insult and/or Democrat compliment.
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
No it's not... I wished I didn't learn what I have learned over the
past couple years... I am leaving a hot mess for my children and grandchildren.
I think there has been issues in the past... BUT because we have the Internet we have access to all kinds of things we never could access before.
I think there has been issues in the past... BUT because we have the Internet we have access to all kinds of things we never could access before.
Yup. The Elitists spent decades infiltrating the Media only to have it negated by the Internet. Hence why the Biden Regime needed to work with Big Tech to sensor "misinformation" (which in Clown World means "facts") on their platforms.
That, or someone gives them a nickel for every Trump insult and/or Democrat compliment.
And Trump Derangement Syndrome is still a thing with these people.
Funny AF, Judge ordered that the Biden administration needs to stop meeting with Big Tech to conspire with them on censorship. Biden Admin
is appealing this judges decision... Judge stated that plaintive, 2
states that are suing will probably will based on the merits of the
case. First amendment issue
Unfortunately, Schiff's probably will vote him back in. What Santos did was before he got elected. However, I think the more important question is whether or not what he did helped him get elected. If so, there is probably at least an ethics violation in there somewhere.
Whatever... maybe someone should review Nancy Pelosi's stock transactions...
not sure what politician has said one thing to get elected and then did the
ct opposite when they got into office.
Funny AF, Judge ordered that the Biden administration needs to stop meetingi
Big Tech to conspire with them on censorship.
Funny AF, Judge ordered that the Biden administration needs to stop meeting with Big Tech to conspire with them on censorship. Biden Adm is appealing this judges decision... Judge stated that plaintive, 2 states that are suing will probably will based on the merits of the case. First amendment issue
Who knows what US Senators Sinema & Manchin discussed behind closed
doors with CEOs at the WEF in Davos?
Ways to help the American people? I doubt it!
IIRC, Santos lied about his identity. Then again, so did Obama at one point in his life, so there is that. Santos also told lies about his background, similar to the "gaffes" that we wish Biden would be held accountable for.
I agree a look into the Pelosi stock transactions would be interesting.
I don't buy the "I didn't tell my husband this or that was going on. He just coincidentally made those transactions at just the right time" excuse.
Whatever happened with that supposed attacker that "showed up" at their house?
Funny AF, Judge ordered that the Biden administration needs to stop meeti
Big Tech to conspire with them on censorship.
And, of course, Former AG Eric Holder immediately came out and said the courts were wrong to do so. Some people do not like free speach.
On 07-06-23 00:03, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Alan Ianson about Re: GARLAND IMPEACHMENT <=-
Dale is a good guy, but his description was a vague
pile of generalizati
What was vague? He was direct and to the point.
Ron said (this is shortened): "The left doesn't like facts"
and then Dale said "That describes MAGA Republicans," but I
said "that's vague" because it's not obvious who he's
talking about: Who are "MAGA Republicans?"
Republicans are not fans of segregation and/or division, so
we don't pay mind to the left's lame attempt to divide us
(MAGGOTS divided by ROMNEYRINOS?)
Accusations are forever, but there's nothing "successful" about an
impeachment that doesn't lead to a conviction.
Once articles of impeachment are passed (by simple majority)
they become ingrained as part of history and can never be removed.
Kind of like a permanent stain that can never be erased.
To me that doesn't mean anything. Does Bill Clinton's "permanent stain" still haunt him?
Once the dunce cap of impeachment is placed on a president's head
it stays put forever. Trump is the only president in history who
successfully donned two of them on top of his orange head at the
same time. Not really sure it is possible for anybody to make it
three.
"Russian collusion story fell apart after media campaign to dethrone Trump"
will be a juicier section of the history book.
IB Joe wrote to Mike Powell <=-
I listened to some legal experts talk on this.... It's a bad
president... Politicians lie... that's what they do.... There is a
group of people in the republican party called RINOs.... If you don't
know that stands for Republican In Name Only.... Well, how do RINOs
get elected....The LIE... once they are in they start voting in a
manner not consistent with their election rhetoric. There is NO
democrat version of a RINO...
Our struggle is not "Right vs. Left" or "Democrat vs. Republican". It's between the Elitists who believe that they need to rule over everyone (because they are so smart, you know) and everyone else.
The Elitists are on in "both" parties. I use the term "both" because there is only 1 party and the people involved keep trying to create an illusion that there are 2 parties. Sort of how they setup Fox news to
be the illusion that there is independent media.
I will never vote party again. I vote for a person only.
I will never vote party again. I vote for a person only.
I will never vote party again. I vote for a person only.
Not me.... The problem with voting Democrat is that you almost always know what you're going to get. I vote Republican... if they look like they are a RINO I won't cast my vote for either.
What you call the Elitists, I'm calling the Uni-Party... Both democrats and
republicans who serve themselves and not the country.
We need term limits ... someone should sneak it in one of those 5000 page bills they pass in the middle of the night without reading or debating it.
I will never vote party again. I vote for a person only.
I stand corrected I would vote for RFK Jr. if it came between RFK Jr. and a
non-Trump republican
What you want is Communism. Soviet-style. Have your "Party" install
your master. Just like Lenin, Stalin, Brezhnev, Andropov, and so many others did in the good old USSR did. Only your guys speaking English rather than Russian.
Removing someone out of office for doing something they didn't do while theyou
e in office is unconstitutional and a bad president.... Lets just say they
muster up enough votes to vote him out.... and you got the warm fuzzyeeling
ou wanted...
The people who voted him in might get pissed... it's up to them, not you, toea
e him in or out. If we start doing what you say... then every 2 years the
rs of the house, whatever party that might be, will be kicking people theyon
like out for whatever reason they feel justified in using.
In 2024 the democrats need to run ads in Santos district reminding them ofhe
diot they elected... Put a good person to run against him and debate him ona
icies.
Let the people who he represents take care of him.... Like the constitution
Funny AF, Judge ordered that the Biden administration needs to stop meet >MP> i
Big Tech to conspire with them on censorship.
And, of course, Former AG Eric Holder immediately came out and said the >MP> courts were wrong to do so. Some people do not like free speach.
Doesn't matter what people like or don't like. The 1st amendment is for the
ple... Federal government can't do a workaround by getting private companies
carry their water.
Who knows what US Senators Sinema & Manchin discussed behind closed doorsith
EOs at the WEF in Davos?
haI will never vote party again. I vote for a person only.
Not me.... The problem with voting Democrat is that you almost always know
you're going to get.
Clearly, MAGA Republicans are devotees of Trump and his like. I'd
include the Freedom caucus of the House as being a sample. Also most of those who attend Trump rallies, chanting "lock her up" on cue, etc.
Paul Manafort, campaign manager for Donald Trump, was convicted
of being in cahoots with Russia. After Trump was elected president,
he pardoned Manafort for his crimes, thus proving the two of them
were in cahoots with Russia. Verdict: GUILTY
Who knows what US Senators Sinema & Manchin discussed behind closed doorith
EOs at the WEF in Davos?
Do we know for sure that they attended?
On 07-07-23 23:26, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: GARLAND IMPEACHMENT <=-
Trump's not much different from other Republican leaders.
America first. Defend the military. Don't have a stupid
vice president. If there's any money left, save it.
On 07-07-23 07:24, Ron L. <=-
spoke to Ib Joe about Re: GARLAND IMPEACHMENT <=-
I will never vote party again. I vote for a person only.
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
What you call the Elitists, I'm calling the Uni-Party... Both democrats and republicans who serve themselves and not the country.
We need term limits ... someone should sneak it in one of those 5000
page bills they pass in the middle of the night without reading or debating it.
vice president. If there's any money left, save it.
The only President in my lifetime who decreased the national debt was a Democrat.
Too many of these swamp creatures are career politians who had several positions over the careers. We need to limit the number of years that they can be in any political office total.
Trump "defend the military"? Maybe only in some abstract sense, but
given that he views those in the military, especially those who were
POWs or KIA, as being stupid -- I don't think that he has much respect
for the military.
I would agree, to a point. If it is something he did while campaigning for office, IMHO, it is not really too different than in office. If he did like Obama or Clinton and admitted to drug use while in college (or lied about it only for it to turn out to be true), I would agree with
your statement that you should not remove them.
If they did something really serious, like were found to have committed a murder, I would disagree. People in Massacheusetts would agree with you, though. At least they did back in the day when they kept voting Ted Kennedy into office.
National level, yes. Here locally we have had some Democrats that were pretty good state reps. There was never a Republican that impressed me more, so they got my vote. One retired. The Republican seemed better than the party-line Democrat that ran against her for the open seat, so then she got my vote.
I will never vote party again. I vote for a person only.
I stand corrected I would vote for RFK Jr. if it came between RFK Jr. and a
non-Trump republican
What you want is Communism. Soviet-style. Have your "Party" install
your master. Just like Lenin, Stalin, Brezhnev, Andropov, and so many
others did in the good old USSR did. Only your guys speaking English
rather than Russian.
I think I just found the source of the cocaine in the White House.... You need to lay off it....
If you haven't got it...
I'm a small Federal government guy...
If they were to reduce the Federal government down buy 75% I don't think it
would be good enough.
I don't know if you know... but Communism the government likes complete control... total control.
I'm a 10th amendment kinda guy...
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or
to the people."
Small federal government... Larger State and Local...
As to your comments about Trump.... BEST president EVER!!!
vice president. If there's any money left, save it.
The only President in my lifetime who decreased the national debt was a
Democrat.
You're probably right about that, but I'm probably right to say that 99% of
Republicans are on-board with Trump policies, and that calling them "MAGA" Republicans isn't as insulting as the media wants it to be.
Paul Manafort, campaign manager for Donald Trump, was convicted
of being in cahoots with Russia. After Trump was elected president,
he pardoned Manafort for his crimes, thus proving the two of them
were in cahoots with Russia. Verdict: GUILTY
Nobody has done more for Russia than Biden.
What interest does Russia have in installing Trump as president of the USA?
Too many of these swamp creatures are career politians who had several
positions over the careers. We need to limit the number of years that
they can be in any political office total.
Another creature to watch out for is the "pathetic loser," which is a GOP candidate who "tried" running for office, but ran a weak campaign, lost, and then he steps out of the shadows later down the road to botch some other campaign - and sometimes these creatures accidentally win elections.
On 07-08-23 10:25, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: GARLAND IMPEACHMENT <=-
The only President in my lifetime who decreased the national debt was a Democrat.
You're probably right about that, but I'm probably right to
say that 99% of Republicans are on-board with Trump
policies, and that calling them "MAGA"
Republicans isn't as insulting as the media wants it to be.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
Another creature to watch out for is the "pathetic loser," which is a
GOP candidate who "tried" running for office, but ran a weak campaign, lost, and then he steps out of the shadows later down the road to botch some other campaign - and sometimes these creatures accidentally win elections.
In around 1990 I tried to be liberal ...
I was in University it was ~1990.
I recall Desert Storm happened...
Universities went on strike...
and a few other things happened...
long story...
The president of the Student Union said something that made my brain snap...
I tried and couldn't do it.
I believe in a system of merit...
a system where one's efforts are rewarded.
Individual rights and liberties.
Today's democrat parties policies are communist and socialist driven.
"But in 1969, the reverse proved true. The closing scene of Chappaquiddick features a bit of archival footage, from a man-on-the-street style interviewons
Boston. A reporter asks one person after another whether they would still
er voting for Kennedy after the Chappaquiddick accident. They answer, manyes
ndingly, with a yes."
It's interesting what the political elites can get away with... Kill someone, y on your political opponents.... Lawfair... charge your politicalpponents..
Whatever.... Lie about your spouses gender...unnin
If I ever get into trouble I'm just going to say I'm a democrat and I'm
for office.... If that doesn't work.... I'll just say I'm trans-gender!!!
In around 1990 I tried to be liberal ... I was in University it was ~1990. I call Desert Storm happened... Universities went on strike... and a few otheromethin
ngs happened... long story... The president of the Student Union said
that made my brain snap...
I tried and couldn't do it. I believe in a system of merit... a system where e's efforts are rewarded. Individual rights and liberties.
Today's democrat parties policies are communist and socialist driven.
Today's democrat parties policies are communist and socialist driven.
Trump is the puppet.
Putin is the puppetmaster.
Put the two together ...
Limiting the number of candidates who can run for office is both anti-democratic and un-American. Time to repeal the 22nd Amendment.
"I am 198 years old." ~President Joe Biden
stand for what the acronym equates to. For me, it means those who
firmly believe in the big lie that Trump won the 2020 election as well
as many of the other policies that Trump espoused, but never
implemented. By no means does it include most Republicans, some
estimates are that Trumps base is about 1/3 of the Republicans.
Another creature to watch out for is the "pathetic loser," which is a GOP candidate who "tried" running for office, but ran a weak campaign lost, and then he steps out of the shadows later down the road to bot some other campaign - and sometimes these creatures accidentally win elections.
How is the "pathetic loser" any different from the other candidates? 8)
But I would make the argument that when such a loser "wins" the election, something nefarious went on during the election to a certain extent.
Hello Joe,
I will never vote party again. I vote for a person only.
I stand corrected I would vote for RFK Jr. if it came between RFK Jr. a
non-Trump republican
Does that rule out Mitt Romney?
On 07-09-23 13:00, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: GARLAND IMPEACHMENT <=-
Nobody thinks that the 2020 election was stolen. Trump had us going
there for a minute, when he claimed that there was a problem with the election, but it seems like he was wrong about that.
If there are still any GOP members of congress out there
supporting that old and unfounded claim, then I'd suspect
them of RINOism, and they're trying to make the GOP look
stupid intentionally (like Rep Marjorie from GA.).
I will never vote party again. I vote for a person only.
RFK Jr.I stand corrected I would vote for RFK Jr. if it came between
a
non-Trump republican
Does that rule out Mitt Romney?
I don't think Mitt is running for President this round... and I would not vote for him... I think he may be primaried out this run around...
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
Democrats have their own military, and it's called "the media."
Republicans don't have any defense against it, and it's called the "slaughter of the innocents."
This is how RINOs get elected. I was just saw my rep in town ahead of
his campaign last year and I saluted him and held up traffic for him
while he crossed the street. And now he betrayed me by voting to
protect Schiff.
Mike Powell wrote to IB JOE <=-
... that is why I could never be a Democrat. I was not real certain until I started meeting other students who identified as Democrats.
While I believed at that time that most of our Democrat politicians
were not communists or socialists, many of the students I met (often my age but also often career students) most certainly were and were proud
to tell you so.
Of course he was wrong -- and he has been caught admitting that he knows it was not stolen. But he keeps repeating the Big Lie, perhaps hoping that he will stir up his base and that so of them actually believe what
he says.
stupid intentionally (like Rep Marjorie from GA.).
For me, such are really the RINOs -- but they are saying that the legitimate Republicans are RINOs.
Democrats have their own military, and it's called "the media."
The media is the Democrat's Propaganda Ministry. Antifa is their military.
Republicans don't have any defense against it, and it's called the "slaughter of the innocents."
It's hard to defend yourself when all the "megaphones" are controlled by the enrmy. But they have defenses. They refuse to use it because most
of them are spineless (by design of the Elite). Candice Owens, for
one of her quote out of context. She showed the whole quote and
basically showed him to be a liar.
We should tell our reps to wage a war against the media.
They don't need to. The current media "empire" is only being propped up by the Elitists. But sooner or later, the money will run out.
Most of us have already moved to alternative forms of news.
Please explain to me how Putin controls Trump? I promise not to argue with you about it, and I won't criticize you about it, but I'd just like to know what the narrative is on that?
Uh, oh! You should have put a trigger warning on that.
You just asked an Ignorant Elitist to lay out an argument backed by
facts. You should know by now that all they can do is chant the slogans that their masters tell them.
ante... that is why I could never be a Democrat. I was not real certain until I started meeting other students who identified as Democrats. While I believed at that time that most of our Democrat politicians
were not communists or socialists, many of the students I met (often my age but also often career students) most certainly were and were proud to tell you so.
My experience was similar.
Anyone I met who was stauchly a Democrat always seemed to be a loser who
1. something for free
2. the gov't to force something on everyone
This is how RINOs get elected. I was just saw my rep in town ahead of hisamp
gn last year and I saluted him and held up traffic for him while he crossedh
street. And now he betrayed me by voting to protect Schiff.
Please explain to me how Putin controls Trump? I promise not to argue with you about it, and I won't criticize you about it, but I'd just
like to know what the narrative is on that?
Uh, oh! You should have put a trigger warning on that.
Television Media - maybe that is a Empire with many kinds of different views and voices.Aaron Thomas wrote to IB Joe <=-
We should tell our reps to wage a war against the media.
They don't need to. The current media "empire" is only being propped up by the Elitists. But sooner or later, the money will run out.
Most of us have already moved to alternative forms of news.True words spoken there.
I haven't had the TV on for about 2 years now (other than to watchI can listen to music - anything while I'm working as I am not on the phones and I am more on the processing side of things, so I listen to music 80's till 12pm or sometimes it's the Glenn Beck show at 9am Definitely tune in at twelve noon as it is the Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Radio Show. (https://www.clayandbuck.com/)
DVDs). I haven't listened to broadcast radio for at least 20 years now.
Did he vote to protect Schiff, or did he refuse to vote yes on something that he knew would not hold up in court? We have a rep here in KY that voted against the original bill for that reason (it wouldn't hold up).
He later voted for the version he believed would hold up in court.
I think that was smart. No need to waste time and money on something you know won't work.
I think that was smart. No need to waste time and money on something you know won't work.
Talk Radio at least in my market of Albany, New York is dominated by Conservative talk radio. No body cares about NPR Radio and the soft spoken creepy whisper speak that is put out on the airwaves.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
The Republicans don't seem to own a single megaphone. People like
Candace Owens should start pointing a fingers at these lackluster Republicans.
It sounds like it was one of the freshman. Established Democrats know better than to converse publicly with Candace Owens.
Mike Powell wrote to Dr. What <=-
Anyone I met who was stauchly a Democrat always seemed to be a loser who wanted:
1. something for free
2. the gov't to force something on everyone
The "career students" were especially bad about these things.
Gregory Deyss wrote to Dr. What <=-
Television Media - maybe that is a Empire with many kinds of different views and voices. Talk Radio at least in my market of Albany, New York
is dominated by Conservative talk radio. No body cares about NPR Radio and the soft spoken creepy whisper speak that is put out on the
airwaves.
I can listen to music - anything while I'm working as I am not on the
Candace Owens should start pointing a fingers at these lackluster Republicans.
They do. But remember that there is only 1 party. The Media doesn't
want people like Candace to point out the problem in the Republican
party because the Uniparty needs to keep up the pretext that there are 2 parties and that people have choice.
Lee surprises me sometimes! Once in a while he makes some subtle comments that almost prove that he sees the truth. I think the Democr thing is a front to impress some chick who's hovering over him while he's on the BBS.
I've always believed that, deep inside, they know what reality is. But they can't face it.
What does it mean when they "don't vote" on something that others have voted
Is that like when they vote "present?"
What does it mean when they "don't vote" on something that others have MP> > v
Is that like when they vote "present?"
I am not 100% sure, but I would guess that "didn't vote" could mean they voted "present," but I would also expect it to mean they were not there
to vote at all. In other words, they were absent.
I have not noticed it in recent years, but I know for several years it
was common for a challenger to point out how often an incumbent missed votes, especially important ones.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
This brings closure to my complaint about Rona McDaniel being nothing
more than a 9-5 gal who doesn't do much more than hold a title. That's
all the uniparty needs her to do.
Mike Powell wrote to AARON THOMAS <=-
I am not 100% sure, but I would guess that "didn't vote" could mean
they voted "present," but I would also expect it to mean they were not there to vote at all. In other words, they were absent.
I have not noticed it in recent years, but I know for several years it
was common for a challenger to point out how often an incumbent missed votes, especially important ones.
I am not 100% sure, but I would guess that "didn't vote" could mean
they voted "present," but I would also expect it to mean they were not there to vote at all. In other words, they were absent.
"Didn't vote" should mean that they were absent.
Voting "present" should mean that they were there and votes, but didn't vote for either side.
Back in school, we would have said "abstain" instead of "present". But Iues
the Elitists don't like abstinence. 8)
more than a 9-5 gal who doesn't do much more than hold a title. That' all the uniparty needs her to do.
Exactly. She's there to help create the illusion of a 2 party system - but only for those who can't think for themselves. And that group is getting smaller every day - or should I say "every scandal".
"Didn't vote" should mean that they were absent.
It's Trump or nothing; nobody else is ever going to care about this country ever again. I think that is what's meant by "Trump: The Last President."
It's Trump or nothing; nobody else is ever going to care about this country ever again. I think that is what's meant by "Trump: The Last President."
Mount Rushmore here we come...
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
Like they took a vacation day or something? And the rest of the GOP- controlled house couldn't make phone calls to make sure all their constituents would be there for an important vote?
They suck so bad at everything!
While the Democrats have nearly mastered mind-control, the Republicans
are still learning to use the telephone.
thisIt's Trump or nothing; nobody else is ever going to care about
Lastcountry ever again. I think that is what's meant by "Trump: The
President."
Mount Rushmore here we come...
I think we can squeeze him in!
Mount Rushmore here we come...
I think we can squeeze him in!
Maybe on the back side. If the Indians let him. Or scalp him first.
Mount Rushmore here we come...
I think we can squeeze him in!
Tucker is interviewing a lot of the GOP candidates right now online... Some of them are shooting themselves in the foot... I love Vivek Ramaswamy... Best answers yet to Tucker.
Mount Rushmore here we come...
I think we can squeeze him in!
Maybe on the back side. If the Indians let him. Or scalp him first.
Natives are conservatives. They know what's up. They don't like Joe's tens of millions of illegals deal.
Some of them are shooting themselves in the foot... I love Vivek Ramaswamy... Best answers yet to Tucker.
Yea I like that guy too. He's using his brain.
Natives are conservatives. They know what's up. They don't like Joe's of millions of illegals deal.
What's it to them? It is the White Man who are the illegals ...
Ramaswamy... Best answers yet to Tucker.
Yea I like that guy too. He's using his brain.
Anyway, I found a long version of what Tucker did, not just broken down into segments... 6 or more hours
Can you post a link to it if you get a chance? (Sorry if you already did and I missed it.)
Trying to watch it all on Twitter sucks.
Here are some highlights
Pence shooting himself in the foot https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C74K8_3VzT8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmmeg-vAJL0&t=17s
Thanks. Trump is still missing. Is Tucker saving him for last?
Thanks. Trump is still missing. Is Tucker saving him for last?
I heard... Trump is playing the long game. Because of his lead he
doesn't want to spend the energy in it... He has everything to lose, nothing to gain... I heard that he was going to wait for the herd to
thin out a little
Pence shooting himself in the foot
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C74K8_3VzT8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmmeg-vAJL0&t=17s
Thanks. Trump is still missing. Is Tucker saving him for last?
Joe'sNatives are conservatives. They know what's up. They don't like
of millions of illegals deal.
What's it to them? It is the White Man who are the illegals ...
It doesn't matter what was legal when ancient people were alive, it matters
what happens to people who are alive right now.
Sounds legit. Trump knows best. But I doubt that any of those other candidates have the energy to defeat him anyway.
Pence shooting himself in the foot
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C74K8_3VzT8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmmeg-vAJL0&t=17s
Thanks. Trump is still missing. Is Tucker saving him for last?
Trump is not missing. He's busy these days spinning up fresh
conspiracies to rile up his base.
I think there will be a few dropping out before the August debate... Pence, Asa and Nikki based on their Tucker performance.
My spidy sense is tingling about Vivek... He spoke at West Palm Beach on Saturday and he was full of energy, like a Baptist minister...
It's early in the game, we'll have to see what's going to be out there
in a few short months... Tucker was RINO hunting and I think he made a
few kills.
It's hard to trust anyone besides Trump. These other guys just emerged from out of nowhere. Trump can't even get a decent running mate because everyone just sucks so bad.
The meme of Tucker as the grim reaper is funny!
There has even been talks about RFK Jr. or Tulsi Gabbard, she recently left the Democrat party because of its Marxist turn.
I know if Trump chose the latter it would bring more Democrats to vote
for him... He might as well get Mike Pence back as VP... or some other
The leftists are still leftists - I don't think that moderates are a real thing. A headline reading "Trump partners with former Democrat" would frustrate me.
I do think there's a lot of moderates out there... I'm not even sure
they can hold their nose to vote for Biden again.
Aaron Thomas wrote to IB Joe <=-
The leftists are still leftists - I don't think that moderates are a
real thing. A headline reading "Trump partners with former Democrat"
would frustrate me.
IB Joe wrote to Aaron Thomas <=-
That's the way I think too... If Trump was to ask RFK Jr in as a VP...
He might just as well ask Pence.
I would like to see someone who can
argue conservative points without folding.... Vivek, Kari Lake or MTG.
I don't think Trump will need a moderate by the next election after Binden's economy is in a recession/depression ... There's a 3rd world war... and the like. I'm not sure, hopeful, that he'll be in office by the end of this year the way things are working out with the House investigation.
I do think there's a lot of moderates out there... I'm not even sure
they can hold their nose to vote for Biden again.
I do think there's a lot of moderates out there... I'm not even sure they can ld their nose to vote for Biden again.
I do think there's a lot of moderates out there... I'm not even sure they can hold their nose to vote for Biden again.
Mike has said before that he too believes that moderates exist. I hope
you guys are right about that. I just don't personally know any.
I would like to see someone who can
argue conservative points without folding.... Vivek, Kari Lake or MTG
Vivek would be a good choice. Kari would be good, but I think she holds more value right now in Arizona. MTG probably wouldn't want the job.
I do think there's a lot of moderates out there... I'm not even sure the ld their nose to vote for Biden again.
I think what will cause people to vote for Biden is their view of Trump. In 2016, Trump's message played well to Independents and undecideds. In 2020, he pulled a Hillary and spent too much time preaching to his own choir.
real thing. A headline reading "Trump partners with former Democrat" would frustrate me.
It depends on the Democrat.
Surprisingly, there are some Democrats that are good. But most of them have left the party. Or, as they put it, their party left them.
On 07-22-23 08:48, Ron L. <=-
spoke to Ib Joe about Re: GARLAND IMPEACHMENT <=-
That's the way I think too... If Trump was to ask RFK Jr in as a VP...
He might just as well ask Pence.
I'd trust RFK Jr. more than I trust Pence. While I may not agree with everything RFK Jr. said, at least he sticks with what he says.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
Surprisingly, there are some Democrats that are good. But most of them have left the party. Or, as they put it, their party left them.
I want that to be true, but who are you referring to?
IB Joe wrote to Mike Powell <=-
Well... When they come after the Independents children and with their
woke ideology you might loose them. My argument is an easy one... If
the Democrats keep going in the direction they are going it'll push
more and more people to the right.
There has even been talks about RFK Jr. or Tulsi Gabbard, she recently
left the Democrat party because of its Marxist turn.
I know if Trump chose the latter it would bring more Democrats to vote
for him... He might as well get Mike Pence back as VP... or some other
The leftists are still leftists -
I don't think that moderates are a real thing.
A headline reading "Trump partners with former Democrat" would frustrate me.
deI think what will cause people to vote for Biden is their view of Trump. In 2016, Trump's message played well to Independents and undecideds. In 2020, he pulled a Hillary and spent too much time preaching to his own choir.
Well... When they come after the Independents children and with their woke
ogy you might loose them. My argument is an easy one... If the Democratseep
oing in the direction they are going it'll push more and more people to thei
t.
have left the party. Or, as they put it, their party left them.
I want that to be true, but who are you referring to?
Off the top of my head, there's Tulsi Gabbard. There was a recent woman congress-critter who switch (sorry, I can't find the article right now).
The leftists are still leftists -
Pence was a plant. Now that he has been exposed for who he is, he
is running for the top job himself. But who is going to vote for a
guy who gave the game away to the fellow in charge today?
Pence and Biden were in cahoots from the get-go ...
At the North Pole, all directions are South.
The Democrat Party keeps moving further and further to the Left. They aren't "pushing" people anywhere. But that line between "Right" and "Left" keeps moving toward the "Left".
It's funny to think that if JFK was alive and running for President
today, he's be a Right Wing Extremist to the Media.
At the North Pole, all directions are South.
The Democrat Party keeps moving further and further to the Left.
They aren't "pushing" people anywhere.
But that line between "Right" and "Left" keeps moving toward the "Left".
It's funny to think that if JFK was alive and running for President today, he's be a Right Wing Extremist to the Media.
On 07-23-23 10:30, Ib Joe <=-
spoke to Ron L. about Re: GARLAND IMPEACHMENT <=-
You keep hearting stories like this... People changing to
Republican because they feel the Democrat Party as of late
have abandoned them...
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
Off the top of my head, there's Tulsi Gabbard. There was a recent woman congress-critter who switch (sorry, I can't find the article right now).
I read that she "endorsed Biden." There's nothing good about that.
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
Yup... The left have been playing the long game trying to corrupt the culture... I think Americans are catching on though.
On 07-23-23 10:30, Ib Joe <=-
spoke to Ron L. about Re: GARLAND IMPEACHMENT <=-
You keep hearting stories like this... People changing to
Republican because they feel the Democrat Party as of late
have abandoned them...
And some have moved in the opposite direction.
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
Yup... The left have been playing the long game trying to corrupt the culture... I think Americans are catching on though.
The "long game" is certainly the correct term here. It's the old story
of the frog in the pot.
If you dump the frog in to a pot of boiling water, he'll jump out immediately. But if you put the frog in a pot of room temp water and
then turn up the heat slowly, he'll let himself be cooked to death.
Trump made the Elitists turn up the heat too much and we all noticed.
Off the top of my head, there's Tulsi Gabbard. There was a recent woman congress-critter who switch (sorry, I can't find the article right now).
I read that she "endorsed Biden." There's nothing good about that.
Early 1900, Woodrow Wilson being the main culprit... John D. Rockefeller...nrec
ot of changes... Federal Reserve was added, and should not have been. Every
r changes are made little by little until a few decades later things are
nizable....
I have heard others claim that a lot of the issues we have now have their roots in Wilson's term as President. I know he had some to do with the racist policies used in the military during WWI, and the policies that returning black troops had to deal with afterwards.
Off the top of my head, there's Tulsi Gabbard. There was a recent wo congress-critter who switch (sorry, I can't find the article right no
I read that she "endorsed Biden." There's nothing good about that.
Nope. Which is why I still don't trust anything she says. But, still, she left the Democratic party.
Off the top of my head, there's Tulsi Gabbard. There was a recent congress-critter who switch (sorry, I can't find the article right
I read that she "endorsed Biden." There's nothing good about that.
Recently?
Who is he kidding, and if they are it's not Biden, that the Democrats are supporting that's for sure, RFK Jr. maybe or perhaps they are hoping that Gruesome Newsom might toss his hat into the mix, but Biden/ and thatOn 07-23-23 10:30, Ib Joe <=-
spoke to Ron L. about Re: GARLAND IMPEACHMENT <=-
You keep hearting stories like this... People changing to
Republican because they feel the Democrat Party as of late
have abandoned them...
And some have moved in the opposite direction.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
Who has left the Democrat party and actually voted conservative on
stuff?
He even voted to censure Adam Schiff. Pretty good guy. But who else?
He's the only one I think.
And some have moved in the opposite direction.Who is he kidding, and if they are it's not Biden, that the Democrats are supporting that's for sure, RFK Jr. maybe or perhaps they are hoping that Gruesome Newsom might toss his hat into the mix, but Biden/ and that "word salad" Harris. I seriously doubt it. Many have doubts that Biden will even be on the ticket. If he is I'll be sure to get Redenbacher's Popcorn for that throwdown debate between Trump / Biden.
According to NBC News (and others) she endorsed Biden after she ended herres
ential run.
Who has left the Democrat party and actually voted conservative on stuff?
Rep Jeff Van Drew is the only one I know about. He switched from Democrat to
ublican and he voted awesomely:
https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/key-votes/24685/jeff-van-drew
He even voted to censure Adam Schiff. Pretty good guy. But who else? He's the ly one I think.
And some have moved in the opposite direction.Who is he kidding, and if they are it's not Biden, that the Democrats
supporting that's for sure, RFK Jr. maybe or perhaps they are hoping t
Gruesome Newsom might toss his hat into the mix, but Biden/ and that "word salad" Harris. I seriously doubt it. Many have doubts that Biden
will even be on the ticket. If he is I'll be sure to get Redenbacher's
Popcorn for that throwdown debate between Trump / Biden.
My good Sir... I really don't think Joe will be around by years end... I think they are throwing him under the bus. I saw something on the News that made me scratch my head... Trump and Obama had spent over $10++ million by this time in their attempts to be re-elected. Biden has
spent $1.?? million. There is NO campaign office or support staff for
the re-election.
The elites cannot loose power... If Trump gets back in and does some investigating into corruption it'll be all over for them...
As far as I'm concerned, there are no "Democrat" and "Republican"
parties. There's only the Uniparty with two shadows that give some
people the illusion that there is choice.
The leftists are still leftists -
Pence was a plant. Now that he has been exposed for who he is, he
is running for the top job himself. But who is going to vote for a
guy who gave the game away to the fellow in charge today?
You're right, and especially about the "plant" thing. I think he was developed in a lab, and there was a lab-leak at some point. He seems to have escaped before the brain was fully developed.
I regret playing-down the fly-on-the-face incident. Humans don't let flies crawl on their faces.
Pence and Biden were in cahoots from the get-go ...
Absolutely. When the hens from The View start clucking for a Republican, it's obvious that something's up.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
There are people in office who have voted on stuff that way I wanted
them to. Those people were not guided by Uniparty. We need more people like them.
Rep Claudia Tenney (R-NY) is a good lady. She votes conservatively. She was the rep for my district until recent redistricting took place. The Uniparty created a new district and then installed POS Marcus Molinaro.
To coin a phrase it will be BIG LEAGUE, Trump will be like a Wrecking Ball! Others on the left get hung up on word semantics like under and because..
"At this point, what difference does it make!"
- Hillary R. Clinton
The left gets into the weeds with Trump's crowd size vs Biden supporters who are all within their own painted white circle just large enough for one person and naturally they are six feet apart.
Nearly a total of 60 people at a Biden venue, vs Trumps thousands of people. Biden rally consists of listening to a politician who has
mumbling speech and yet these Democratic imbeciles clap applaud as if
they understood him? The Same thing happens to a larger degree anytime this man attempts speech. It was suggested that Joe Biden has a
stuttering problem? That might be true but THAT is a rather a poor
excuse and IT is also provided as a cover for what is really happening.
Biden has a BIG cognitive issue and it is getting worse.
This can be plainly seen with prior videos of him where he is talking
fine and then there is the recent videos. The comparison shows the truth. Speed of speech, the pitch & tone are different as well.
Now all we get on occasion is Biden leaning into the mic and out comes a creepy whisper. Seriously?
Biden's cognitive decline is very apparent. What is more troubling is
that this is ignored by his handlers and it has been for a long time
time ignored by the main stream media.
If Trump spoke like this it would mean a one way ticket to Walter Reed..
Why is it at a Biden Rally there is no chanting USA! USA! USA!
Could it be that they despise America?
You're right, and especially about the "plant" thing. I think he was developed in a lab, and there was a lab-leak at some point. He seems have escaped before the brain was fully developed.
Now that he has been caught out he is trying to change his tune,
claiming Trump might not be guilty of having committed any crimes
on January 6. In which case, he would like to change his vote to
certify the election ...
Pence had his chance. Live and on stage. Just like Obama.
And we all know what Obama did, as the entire nation saw him
do it. With one swat, right on target, that fly was *DEAD*!
You do realize both Hillary Clinton and Elizabeth Warren used
to be Republicans. Just imagine what would happen if they team
up together, and shock the world by wearing red, as they once
did in their younger years.
On 25 Jul 2023, Gregory Deyss said the following...
To coin a phrase it will be BIG LEAGUE, Trump will be like a Wrecking Ball! Others on the left get hung up on word semantics like under and
because..
"At this point, what difference does it make!"
- Hillary R. Clinton
The left gets into the weeds with Trump's crowd size vs Biden supporte
who are all within their own painted white circle just large enough fo
one person and naturally they are six feet apart.
Nearly a total of 60 people at a Biden venue, vs Trumps thousands of people. Biden rally consists of listening to a politician who has mumbling speech and yet these Democratic imbeciles clap applaud as if they understood him? The Same thing happens to a larger degree anytim
this man attempts speech. It was suggested that Joe Biden has a stuttering problem? That might be true but THAT is a rather a poor excuse and IT is also provided as a cover for what is really happening
There is a lot to respond to here... There is a preacher who has a
YouTube channel, as well as other platforms, who is a trump supporter.
He posted a video about being thankful for God not answering prayers.
He said... If VP Judas Pence actually sent the double sets of electors back to the states who sent in a second set for clarification... and
Trump would have gotten into office because of that... He would have actually been impeached in January... If not then we'd be on out 15th impeachment by now.
The issues with election corruption would not have been exposed. The
true evil intentions of the Democratic party's struggle for power would not have been exposed... Corruption in the political class was exposed. The argument of Left VS Right.... is BS ... even the Elites VS the non-Elites... I say it's Good VS Evil. It seems that every agency in
our government has been corrupted and are not doing the peoples business but rather their own.
Hopefully the country doesn't collapse between now and November 2024...
Biden has a BIG cognitive issue and it is getting worse.
This can be plainly seen with prior videos of him where he is talking fine and then there is the recent videos. The comparison shows the tru
Speed of speech, the pitch & tone are different as well.
Now all we get on occasion is Biden leaning into the mic and out comes
creepy whisper. Seriously?
Biden's cognitive decline is very apparent. What is more troubling is that this is ignored by his handlers and it has been for a long time time ignored by the main stream media.
If Trump spoke like this it would mean a one way ticket to Walter Reed
Why is it at a Biden Rally there is no chanting USA! USA! USA! Could it be that they despise America?
I have been watching this as well... the decline is not linear... exponential... The rate he's going he might not make his impeachment trial.Here is more to un-pack my good sir. :)
Here is more to un-pack my good sir. :)
The lefties are going to lose it.
Right they could say that Biden is too ill to go through the impeachment proceedings. Biden is approaching fast the red line, where McCarthy will start this process.
Should also impeach wide-eyed Mayorkas and Garland too.
As these slime balls need to fall from grace, I want to see these
arrogant SOB's wearing a plaster casts, (as in something broken) nothing too severe though that would be the next best thing to being tared and feathered and carried amongst cobblestone streets.
Hunter Biden had a Helluva Day On / Off - On / Off
"All roads lead to Joe Biden." - James Comer
There should of been a special counsel in the first place. Let's hope there is now a special counsel and that it's this slow-waked.
Good for the Judge who refused to just "Rubber Stamp" this.
Additionally....
A women from Hunter's law firm called the clerk of the court in Wilmington, Delaware and represented herself Falsely as the attorney of Rep. Jason Smith to get a amicus brief document removed, but the Judge
in Wilmington figured this out due to the Caller ID being from New York. Whoops-a-Daisy.... Dumb and Dumber Law firm LLC. who doesn't know how
to block caller ID *67
James Comer: This a 'victory for justice in America' https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kNavLhetlN0
Timestamp: 2:02
verified from Google
you dial *67, your phone sends a signal to your provider requesting a caller ID block.
Please hear me out.... If the focus is on Joe it'll get
all political... BUT if the focus is on Wray and Garland whereby the
focus on the DOJ and FBI corruption... while simultaneously, and at the same time, build a case against the Bidens would be a better approach.
The tide is turning for the Bidens, as per the Judge yesterday not rubber stamping the deal... I don't think Joe would make the next election... IJ> We need to relax and try to save the republic. Next week will beI see and agree with your points. There is a easier way. Firing Squad, but we will do it the correct way, less mess.
telling with the testimony of his friend and as well as the other 2.
IB Joe wrote to Gregory Deyss <=-
Impeach if they have the goods with Bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors.... Please hear me out.... If the focus is on Joe it'll
get all political... BUT if the focus is on Wray and Garland whereby
the focus on the DOJ and FBI corruption... while simultaneously, and at the same time, build a case against the Bidens would be a better
approach.
I see and agree with your points. There is a easier way. Firing Squad,
but we will do it the correct way, less mess.
I think that the corruption is much, much deeper than many of us
realized. We certainly need to think about the right way to fix it. We don't want to fix a symptom, so to speak, that allows the cause to go undetected.
The tide is turning for the Bidens, as per the Judge yesterday not rubbertam
ng the deal... I don't think Joe would make the next election... We need to
Unless Obama decides he wants a fourth term.
Bill Clinton should not have been impeached over lying about a Blow Job!!!
Unless Obama decides he wants a fourth term.
I think there is a major portion of the population who have woken up...
I'm not sure if Barry will get back in for the forth term
Joe is done in 2024, his health, physical and mental, he's done. Moreover, his policies are destroying the country... Normal democrats
are starting to see this... Keep investigating this... all the way
until the beginning of January 2025... even after he looses the 2024 election...
The tide is turning for the Bidens, as per the Judge yesterday not rubbetam
ng the deal... I don't think Joe would make the next election... We nee
Unless Obama decides he wants a fourth term.
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
I think this is why the investigative focus should be on the
DOJ/FBI/CIA et al. The corruption in those departments should be fully exposed... fully... so when Trump gets in the people aren't so
confused as to why a wrecking ball shows up to these agencies on
January 21st 2025.
Joe is done in 2024, his health, physical and mental, he's done.
Moreover, his policies are destroying the country... Normal democrats
are starting to see this...
Take all the evidence to a legitimate prosecutor and prosecute the
crime family...
With Vivek at his side, as VP, telling him, Trump, that he looks
handsome when he exacts vengeance on these agencies for the American people... While simultaneously implementing his America First
policies...
Bill Clinton should not have been impeached over lying about a Blow Job
I don't, either. Then again, receiving one while discussing information that the giver did not have clearance to hear... I think there should be some consequences for that.
What the GOP did then, and the Democrats did to Trump, has cheapened the whole impeachment process.
Biden was on the news the other day saying that they're going to impeach him because inflation is down its highs.
Lets investigate the corruption of the DOJ and the Biden crime family once you have a rock solid case, and I'm told we do,
we need a rock solider case... I don't want people to look back a Biden's impeachment and it be viewed as political...
Once the GOP has control of the DOJ a special council can be setup to investigate and hold the Crime Family accountable... Navy will be glad she doesn't have the Biden last name.
I would like to agree, but there is still a large portion who are upset that Hillary didn't win in 2016 and long for a return to those times. There is a huge generational difference between those of us who are
around 50+, and are used to having jobs and making our own money, and others who are closer to 18 and who are more used to the idea of living off of others.
I will give you one guess as to which side that latter group will be
drawn to, no matter how senile the choice might be.
Joe's health is just fine. His mental health especially. It's all just
an act. "That adorable old man couldn't hurt a fly." Yea right. He knows all about all the sick and horrible things that he's doing to human beings. He has superiors, like his donors, but he's a part of the team, and he's a real team player too.
There's no such thing as "normal democrats." They have all sold their souls (and not for rock n roll.) There's no "I'm a better Democrat than Joe Biden;" they are all in on it, and a good portion of our Republicans are in on evil as well.
Next time you see a Democrat, ask them why their party let more than 2000 people die along the US/Mexico border since 2020. They ALL are complicit.
Democrats aren't normal.
I wouldn't mind Vivek as VP. But I don't know if Vivek would accept VP.
Joe is not fine... There are a lot of politicians not fine... WAY
TOOOOOOO Ephin old to be in the government working, on both sides of the isle.
The GOP cares nothing about law & order, never did. They don't even care about national security.The GOP were not the ones behind Defund the Police.
Like Joe Biden or not the economy is doing well. Much better that it was doing under Trump.The economy? hold up...
You're not going to see what we see, if you're watching CNN, MSNBC, or other lefty networks.Lets investigate the corruption of the DOJ and the Biden crime family onc
you have a rock solid case, and I'm told we do,
Who told you that!
I think there are a lot of people waking up ... Francis Ford Coppola inI don't know about that Joe :)
an article claimed her had regrets voting for Biden... There are all
kinds of people with buyers remorse. If the crime starts hitting the
the rich people's areas... maybe people start camping and defecating on their sidewalks... They'll vote for Trump in 2024... Even Woppie will.
The GOP were not the ones behind Defund the Police.
but after this failed and crime started to mount, beyond their comfort zone, that are signing refund the police.
Nor were the GOP members defending BLM or the beyond dumb critical race theory gibberish.
Like Joe Biden or not the economy is doing well. Much better that it was
doing under Trump.
The economy? hold up...
First of all you are in Canada eh?, so how in the sam hill would know, what the economy is like here in the United States?
Packages, containers of food, snacks included are indeed getting smaller and the cost is going up.
Who told you that!
You're not going to see what we see, if you're watching CNN, MSNBC, or other lefty networks.
I think there are a lot of people waking up ... Francis Ford Coppola an article claimed her had regrets voting for Biden... There are all kinds of people with buyers remorse. If the crime starts hitting the the rich people's areas... maybe people start camping and defecating their sidewalks... They'll vote for Trump in 2024... Even Woppie willI don't know about that Joe :)
I think those ugly mugs on The View are permanently damaged goods.
if you must watch Cover your watch_face, otherwise it will always be
6:30, they ain't going to rise up for any of those nasty creatures of
The View.
Where? Show us, let me guess a lefty leaning website that will tell you and agree with your predetermined views. I think I am spot on with that analysis.The economy? hold up...
First of all you are in Canada eh?, so how in the sam hill would know, wh
the economy is like here in the United States?
I looked it up. Ever do that?
Do an honest side by side comparison of the economy under Trump/Biden.You really want me to do that? be absolutely sure.
I swear, the truth doesn't hurt at all.You might want to go out and grab a first aid kit or at the very least
I looked it up. Ever do that?Where? Show us, let me guess a lefty leaning website that will tell you and agree with your predetermined views. I think I am spot on with that analysis.
Do an honest side by side comparison of the economy under Trump/Biden.You really want me to do that? be absolutely sure.
I will share the findings here. Trust me you won't like the results.
I swear, the truth doesn't hurt at all.You might want to go out and grab a first aid kit or at the very least
some hot chocolate w/ the mini marshmallows, you will something to help you cope when the real truth is released.
Joe is done in 2024, his health, physical and mental, he's done.
Moreover, his policies are destroying the country... Normal democrats
are starting to see this... Keep investigating this... all the way
until the beginning of January 2025... even after he looses the 2024
election...
Joe's health is just fine. His mental health especially. It's all just an act.
"That adorable old man couldn't hurt a fly." Yea right. He knows all about all the sick and horrible things that he's doing to human beings. He has superiors, like his donors, but he's a part of the team, and he's a real team player too.
There's no such thing as "normal democrats."
They have all sold their souls (and not for rock n roll.)
There's no "I'm a better Democrat than Joe Biden;" they are all in on it, and a good portion of our Republicans are in on evil as well.
Next time you see a Democrat, ask them why their party let more than 2000 people die along the US/Mexico border since 2020.
They ALL are complicit.
Bill Clinton should not have been impeached over lying about a Blow Job!!!
I don't, either.
Then again, receiving one while discussing information that the giver did not have clearance to hear... I think there should be
some consequences for that.
Blow JobBill Clinton should not have been impeached over lying about a
I don't, either. Then again, receiving one while discussinginformation
that the giver did not have clearance to hear... I think there shouldbe
some consequences for that.
Lying about a blow job is not a High Crime or Misdemeanor...
It was not a good thing for Bill to get a young girl to do...
Speaks volumes of his character and Hillary's inability to give a good blow
job..
"I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Ms. Lewinski!"
~ Bill Clinton
Well, that explains it. Hillary was incompetent. Monica was great ...
Democrats aren't normal.
I heard a comedian say... in 2016 when Trump beat Hillary... The Democratsav
't been that mad since the Republicans freed the slaves...
The economy? hold up...h
First of all you are in Canada eh?, so how in the sam hill would know, what
economy is like here in the United States?
Packages, containers of food, snacks included are indeed getting smaller and
cost is going up.
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
I heard a comedian say... in 2016 when Trump beat Hillary... The
Democrats haven't been that mad since the Republicans freed the
slaves...
I heard a comedian say... in 2016 when Trump beat Hillary... The Democraav
't been that mad since the Republicans freed the slaves...
That is likely a true statement.
"I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Ms. Lewinski!"
~ Bill Clinton
Sorry... That's Miss Lewinski, not Ms... It would be Ms. Clinton... Bill's wife.
Well, that explains it. Hillary was incompetent. Monica was great ...
And that is how history should have seen it.... without the impeachment.
Joe's health is just fine. His mental health especially. It's all jus act.
Yes. We know. But nobody else does. And that is the secret of his
success. Which makes him Joe the Invincible.
There's no such thing as "normal democrats."
Not even FDR himself was able to name his program after himself.
And you know what that means. What we have now is not a new deal,
but the greatest steal ever!
They have all sold their souls (and not for rock n roll.)
If evil did not exist, would there be a church? You claim we have
all sold our souls. Which would mean there is no more evil. With no
one left to save, who or what would be our god?
They ALL are complicit.
We should feed the world. Not just Mexico.
Mike Powell wrote to GREGORY DEYSS <=-
I would not be shocked if Al does not even shop for himself.
| Sysop: | deepend |
|---|---|
| Location: | Calgary, Alberta |
| Users: | 240 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 67:02:38 |
| Calls: | 1,456 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 3,352 |
| Messages: | 357,915 |